Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #73323 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-06-16 15:01 -0400 |
| Last post | 2014-06-16 15:01 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: module_traverse segfault Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-06-16 15:01 -0400
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-16 15:01 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: module_traverse segfault |
| Message-ID | <mailman.11094.1402945322.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On 6/16/2014 1:14 PM, Roland Plüss wrote: > I'm still trying to get Python3 embedded working. The main problem I'm > hitting now is an unexplainable segfault: /unexplainable/unexplained/ ;-) > Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. > 0x00007fffffffc958 in ?? () > (gdb) bt > #0 0x00007fffffffc958 in ?? () > #1 0x00007fffdd2f9ed0 in module_traverse () from > /usr/lib64/libpython3.3.so.1.0 > #2 0x00007fffdd396cc7 in collect_with_callback () from > /usr/lib64/libpython3.3.so.1.0 > #3 0x00007fffdd397738 in PyGC_Collect () from > /usr/lib64/libpython3.3.so.1.0 > #4 0x00007fffdd3808ca in Py_Finalize () from /usr/lib64/libpython3.3.so.1.0 Can you run (some of) the same code in a normal interpreter? If so, does it raise an uncaught exception? Was the program supposed to be shutting down when this occurred? Or did this happen during 'normal' execution? In any case, switch to 3.4.1 or later for improved gc and finalization. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web