Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #9600 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-07-16 15:19 +1000 |
| Last post | 2011-07-16 15:19 +1000 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Python threading/multiprocessing issue. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-07-16 15:19 +1000
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-16 15:19 +1000 |
| Subject | Re: Python threading/multiprocessing issue. |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1101.1310793564.1164.python-list@python.org> |
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 3:15 PM, Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> wrote: > And (so far as I understand it) each process can claim its own CPU > core, whereas threads share the active core. Threads can be put onto separate cores too, and can have their affinities set. But because of the GIL, actual CPython code can't run on two cores at once. You might be able to have two Python threads running at once if they're calling into C modules most of the time, but it's much safer to either go multiprocessing or to use I/O bound threads (eg socket handlers). ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web