Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #72758 > unrolled thread
| Started by | R Johnson <ps16thypresenceisfullnessofjoy@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-06-05 16:12 -0400 |
| Last post | 2014-06-05 16:12 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
How to use SQLite (sqlite3) more efficiently R Johnson <ps16thypresenceisfullnessofjoy@gmail.com> - 2014-06-05 16:12 -0400
| From | R Johnson <ps16thypresenceisfullnessofjoy@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-06-05 16:12 -0400 |
| Subject | How to use SQLite (sqlite3) more efficiently |
| Message-ID | <mailman.10764.1401999691.18130.python-list@python.org> |
I forgot to mention that the scripts Peter pointed to used REPLACE instead of INSERT OR REPLACE. The SQLite documentation says that REPLACE is an alias for INSERT OR REPLACE provided for compatibility with other SQL database engines. Is there a preference for one or the other? I had changed my code from using INSERT OR REPLACE to using REPLACE (including my new sample), but since then changed it back. I don't care about compatibility with other database engines, and INSERT OR REPLACE seems more logical to me, since REPLACE sounds like a synonym for UPDATE. -- Timothy
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web