Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #22253 > unrolled thread

Re: Slow termination of process

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2012-03-28 07:57 +1100
Last post2012-03-28 07:57 +1100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Slow termination of process Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-03-28 07:57 +1100

#22253 — Re: Slow termination of process

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2012-03-28 07:57 +1100
SubjectRe: Slow termination of process
Message-ID<mailman.1048.1332881839.3037.python-list@python.org>
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Roland Hedberg <roland@catalogix.se> wrote:
> So, I went for the low-hanging fruit and defined my own TCPServer class
>
> class MyTCPServer(SocketServer.TCPServer):
>    def __init__(self, server_address, RequestHandlerClass):
>        self.allow_reuse_address = True
>        SocketServer.TCPServer.__init__(self, server_address,
>                                        RequestHandlerClass)
>
> and this solved my problem!
>
> So, thanks again Chris!

Awesome! I wonder - and someone who's used the facility may know
better than I - is there a reason not to make these sorts of things
into keyword-only arguments? Or, more generally, is there a reason for
them to be class variables rather than instance?

Chris Angelico

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web