Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #44271 > unrolled thread

improvements sought re. logging across modules

Started byThe Night Tripper <jkn+gg@nicorp.co.uk>
First post2013-04-24 17:54 +0100
Last post2013-04-24 13:55 -0400
Articles 4 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python


Contents

  improvements sought re. logging across modules The Night Tripper <jkn+gg@nicorp.co.uk> - 2013-04-24 17:54 +0100
    Re: improvements sought re. logging across modules Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-04-24 18:29 +0100
    Re: improvements sought re. logging across modules Chris “Kwpolska” Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com> - 2013-04-24 19:43 +0200
    Re: improvements sought re. logging across modules Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-04-24 13:55 -0400

#44271 — improvements sought re. logging across modules

FromThe Night Tripper <jkn+gg@nicorp.co.uk>
Date2013-04-24 17:54 +0100
Subjectimprovements sought re. logging across modules
Message-ID<D9OdncANCNCqk-XMnZ2dnUVZ8sOdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
Hi all
	I have a small suite of python modules, say

	A.py
	B.py
	C.py

which can be invoked in a variety of ways. eg. 

1) A.py is invoked directly; this imports and uses B.py and C.py

2) B.py is invoked; this imports and uses A.py and C.py

I use the logging module in all of these python modules, and I want to be 
able to use a single logger across the entire suite of whichever set of 
scripts is running. 

The way I do this at the moment is to have a separate module mylogger.py:

== mylogger.py ==

import logging

class MyLogger:   #using python 2.4 ;-o
    def __init__(self):
        self.log = logging.getLogger(MY_APP_NAME)
    def setupLogging(self):
        self.log.setlevel(logging.DEBUG)
        # ...

# our singleton logging object
mylogger = Mylogger()
# EOF

and then in my other modules A.py, B.py etc. I have something like:

== A.py ==

import mylogger
gLog = mylogger.mylogger

if __name__ == "__main__":
    gLog.setupLogging()
    gLog.info("Module A running as main")
    main()
#EOF

== B.py ==

import mylogger
gLog = mylogger.mylogger

if __name__ == "__main__":
    gLog.setupLogging()
    gLog.info("Module B running as main")
    main()
# EOF

This works, but I can't help thinking I'm missing a trick here. Any 
suggestions?

    Thanks
    j^n

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#44275

FromFábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com>
Date2013-04-24 18:29 +0100
Message-ID<mailman.1023.1366824584.3114.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#44271

[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw

Maybe import mylogger.mylogger as gLog? I don't know what you mean by
"missing a trick". Your example seems pretty pythonic to me, except for the
fact that you use a singleton where you could have a couple of functions
and use the module as the namespace.
On 24 Apr 2013 17:58, "The Night Tripper" <jkn+gg@nicorp.co.uk> wrote:

> Hi all
>         I have a small suite of python modules, say
>
>         A.py
>         B.py
>         C.py
>
> which can be invoked in a variety of ways. eg.
>
> 1) A.py is invoked directly; this imports and uses B.py and C.py
>
> 2) B.py is invoked; this imports and uses A.py and C.py
>
> I use the logging module in all of these python modules, and I want to be
> able to use a single logger across the entire suite of whichever set of
> scripts is running.
>
> The way I do this at the moment is to have a separate module mylogger.py:
>
> == mylogger.py ==
>
> import logging
>
> class MyLogger:   #using python 2.4 ;-o
>     def __init__(self):
>         self.log = logging.getLogger(MY_APP_NAME)
>     def setupLogging(self):
>         self.log.setlevel(logging.DEBUG)
>         # ...
>
> # our singleton logging object
> mylogger = Mylogger()
> # EOF
>
> and then in my other modules A.py, B.py etc. I have something like:
>
> == A.py ==
>
> import mylogger
> gLog = mylogger.mylogger
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
>     gLog.setupLogging()
>     gLog.info("Module A running as main")
>     main()
> #EOF
>
> == B.py ==
>
> import mylogger
> gLog = mylogger.mylogger
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
>     gLog.setupLogging()
>     gLog.info("Module B running as main")
>     main()
> # EOF
>
> This works, but I can't help thinking I'm missing a trick here. Any
> suggestions?
>
>     Thanks
>     j^n
>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44277

FromChris “Kwpolska” Warrick <kwpolska@gmail.com>
Date2013-04-24 19:43 +0200
Message-ID<mailman.1024.1366825433.3114.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#44271
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 6:54 PM, The Night Tripper <jkn+gg@nicorp.co.uk> wrote:
> Hi all
>         I have a small suite of python modules, say
>
>         A.py
>         B.py
>         C.py
>
> which can be invoked in a variety of ways. eg.
>
> 1) A.py is invoked directly; this imports and uses B.py and C.py
>
> 2) B.py is invoked; this imports and uses A.py and C.py
>
> I use the logging module in all of these python modules, and I want to be
> able to use a single logger across the entire suite of whichever set of
> scripts is running.
>
> The way I do this at the moment is to have a separate module mylogger.py:
>
> == mylogger.py ==
>
> import logging
>
> class MyLogger:   #using python 2.4 ;-o
>     def __init__(self):
>         self.log = logging.getLogger(MY_APP_NAME)
>     def setupLogging(self):
>         self.log.setlevel(logging.DEBUG)
>         # ...
>
> # our singleton logging object
> mylogger = Mylogger()
> # EOF
>
> and then in my other modules A.py, B.py etc. I have something like:
>
> == A.py ==
>
> import mylogger
> gLog = mylogger.mylogger
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
>     gLog.setupLogging()
>     gLog.info("Module A running as main")
>     main()
> #EOF
>
> == B.py ==
>
> import mylogger
> gLog = mylogger.mylogger
>
> if __name__ == "__main__":
>     gLog.setupLogging()
>     gLog.info("Module B running as main")
>     main()
> # EOF
>
> This works, but I can't help thinking I'm missing a trick here. Any
> suggestions?
>
>     Thanks
>     j^n
>
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list

No need to do such magic.  Just set logging up as you would normally.
The first logging instance should pick up logs from everywhere.  For
example:

=== aurqt/aqds.py ===
class AQDS:
    logging.basicConfig(format='%(asctime)-15s [%(levelname)-7s] '
                        ':%(name)-10s: %(message)s',
                        filename=os.path.join(confdir, 'aurqt.log'),
                        level=logging.DEBUG)
    log = logging.getLogger('aurqt')
    console = logging.StreamHandler()
    console.setLevel(logging.INFO)
    console.setFormatter(logging.Formatter('[%(levelname)-7s] '
                         ':%(name)-10s: %(message)s'))
    logging.getLogger('').addHandler(console)
    log.info('*** aurqt v' + __version__)

=== pkgbuilder/pbds.py ===
class PBDS:
    logging.basicConfig(format='%(asctime)-15s [%(levelname)-7s] '
                        ':%(name)-10s: %(message)s',
                        filename=os.path.join(confdir, 'pkgbuilder.log'),
                        level=logging.DEBUG)
    log = logging.getLogger('pkgbuilder')
    log.info('*** PKGBUILDer v' + __version__)

=== aurqt/__init__.py ===
from .aqds import AQDS
DS = AQDS()
import pkgbuilder # ← also imports pkgbuilder.DS = pkgbuilder.pbds.PBDS()

=== bin/aurqt output ===
[INFO   ] :aurqt     : *** aurqt v0.1.0
[INFO   ] :requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: Starting new
HTTPS connection (1): aur.archlinux.org
[WARNING] :pkgbuilder: tty-clock version is a date, ignored for downgrade.

=== {confdir}/aurqt.log ===
2013-04-24 19:34:21,079 [INFO   ] :aurqt     : *** aurqt v0.1.0
2013-04-24 19:35:19,096 [WARNING]
:requests.packages.urllib3.connectionpool: Starting new HTTPS
connection (1): aur.archlinux.org
2013-04-24 19:35:21,004 [WARNING] :pkgbuilder: tty-clock version is a
date, ignored for downgrade.

--
Kwpolska <http://kwpolska.tk> | GPG KEY: 5EAAEA16
stop html mail                | always bottom-post
http://asciiribbon.org        | http://caliburn.nl/topposting.html

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#44280

FromDave Angel <davea@davea.name>
Date2013-04-24 13:55 -0400
Message-ID<mailman.1027.1366826130.3114.python-list@python.org>
In reply to#44271
On 04/24/2013 12:54 PM, The Night Tripper wrote:
> Hi all
> 	I have a small suite of python modules, say
>
> 	A.py
> 	B.py
> 	C.py
>
> which can be invoked in a variety of ways. eg.
>
> 1) A.py is invoked directly; this imports and uses B.py and C.py
>
> 2) B.py is invoked; this imports and uses A.py and C.py
>

Right there you have a potential problem.  Unless you make those imports 
conditional, you have an import loop, which can be a minor problem, or a 
big one.

Whenever you find loops in the import call tree, please break them.  The 
best way is to move the interdependencies into yet another module, and 
let both A and B import that one.



-- 
DaveA

[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web