Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #9455 > unrolled thread
| Started by | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-07-14 02:04 +0100 |
| Last post | 2011-07-14 02:04 +0100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: should i install python image library by myself? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2011-07-14 02:04 +0100
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-07-14 02:04 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: should i install python image library by myself? |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1014.1310605575.1164.python-list@python.org> |
On 14/07/2011 01:18, think wrote:
> when i type import image in the python interactive command, i am
> surprised to find that it does not work. the details are as follows:
> >>> import image
> Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "<stdin>", line 1, in ?
> ImportError: No module named image
> i wonder the image library should be a buildin module, then why i cannot
> import it?
> what's wrong? or some version of python does not include image library
> as a buildin module?
> so can anybody recommend a version of python which include image libary,
> thank you ; )
>
The usual image library used in Python is the Python Imaging Library
("PIL"). It isn't one of the standard modules.
Have a look here: http://www.pythonware.com/products/pil/
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web