Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #44229 > unrolled thread

Re: using pandoc instead of rst to document python

Started by"R. Michael Weylandt" <michael.weylandt@gmail.com>
First post2013-04-23 18:40 -0400
Last post2013-04-23 18:40 -0400
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: using pandoc instead of rst to document python "R. Michael Weylandt" <michael.weylandt@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 18:40 -0400

#44229 — Re: using pandoc instead of rst to document python

From"R. Michael Weylandt" <michael.weylandt@gmail.com>
Date2013-04-23 18:40 -0400
SubjectRe: using pandoc instead of rst to document python
Message-ID<mailman.1003.1366756858.3114.python-list@python.org>
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Peng Yu <pengyu.ut@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering if it possible to use pandoc instead of rst to document
> python. Is there a documentation system support this format of python
> document?

Pandoc is a converter while rst is a format so they're not directly
comparable; pandoc can convert _to_ and _from_ rst to a wide variety
of other formats, but you still have to write documentation in one
format or another. If you want to use an rst-centric documentation
tool, you can write in, e.g., Markdown, convert to rst and then run
your other tool on it.

Michael

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web