Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #44229 > unrolled thread
| Started by | "R. Michael Weylandt" <michael.weylandt@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-04-23 18:40 -0400 |
| Last post | 2013-04-23 18:40 -0400 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: using pandoc instead of rst to document python "R. Michael Weylandt" <michael.weylandt@gmail.com> - 2013-04-23 18:40 -0400
| From | "R. Michael Weylandt" <michael.weylandt@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-04-23 18:40 -0400 |
| Subject | Re: using pandoc instead of rst to document python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1003.1366756858.3114.python-list@python.org> |
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Peng Yu <pengyu.ut@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm wondering if it possible to use pandoc instead of rst to document > python. Is there a documentation system support this format of python > document? Pandoc is a converter while rst is a format so they're not directly comparable; pandoc can convert _to_ and _from_ rst to a wide variety of other formats, but you still have to write documentation in one format or another. If you want to use an rst-centric documentation tool, you can write in, e.g., Markdown, convert to rst and then run your other tool on it. Michael
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web