Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #101284 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2016-01-05 19:48 -0500 |
| Last post | 2016-01-10 16:19 -0500 |
| Articles | 6 — 2 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Python launcher options Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> - 2016-01-05 19:48 -0500
Re: Python launcher options Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2016-01-09 16:03 +0000
Re: Python launcher options Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> - 2016-01-10 00:18 -0500
Re: Python launcher options Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2016-01-10 11:38 +0000
Re: Python launcher options Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> - 2016-01-10 16:09 -0500
Re: Python launcher options Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> - 2016-01-10 16:19 -0500
| From | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-05 19:48 -0500 |
| Subject | Python launcher options |
| Message-ID | <n6ho49$ce2$1@dont-email.me> |
The Python launcher in Windows is a neat tool for running multiple versions of Python 2 and Python 3 at different times. It allows as options the ability to specify the latest version of either Python 2 or Python 3 defaulting to the 64-bit version if both exist, or a specific 32-bit or 64-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. What is missing is the ability to specify the latest 32-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. The equivalent syntax would be '-2-32' or '-3-32'. Is there some reason why this option has been disallowed ?
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-09 16:03 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.97.1452355418.2305.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #101284 |
On 06/01/2016 00:48, Edward Diener wrote: > The Python launcher in Windows is a neat tool for running multiple > versions of Python 2 and Python 3 at different times. It allows as > options the ability to specify the latest version of either Python 2 or > Python 3 defaulting to the 64-bit version if both exist, or a specific > 32-bit or 64-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. What is missing is the > ability to specify the latest 32-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. > The equivalent syntax would be '-2-32' or '-3-32'. Is there some reason > why this option has been disallowed ? As far as I can remember, it's not so much a question of "disallowed" as just "not thought of by anyone". If you wanted this to go anywhere, could I suggest you create an issue on the Python issue tracker: http://bugs.python.org and mark it as "Windows" in the [Components] field (that makes sure that some relevant people get to see it). It's got a much better chance of achieving traction if you can actually provide a code patch to implement the behaviour. Failing that, at least make a good case which might convince one of the developers that it would it be worth their while implementing the change. TJG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-10 00:18 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n6spe9$q4l$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #101409 |
On 1/9/2016 11:03 AM, Tim Golden wrote: > On 06/01/2016 00:48, Edward Diener wrote: >> The Python launcher in Windows is a neat tool for running multiple >> versions of Python 2 and Python 3 at different times. It allows as >> options the ability to specify the latest version of either Python 2 or >> Python 3 defaulting to the 64-bit version if both exist, or a specific >> 32-bit or 64-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. What is missing is the >> ability to specify the latest 32-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. >> The equivalent syntax would be '-2-32' or '-3-32'. Is there some reason >> why this option has been disallowed ? > > As far as I can remember, it's not so much a question of "disallowed" as > just "not thought of by anyone". If you wanted this to go anywhere, > could I suggest you create an issue on the Python issue tracker: > > http://bugs.python.org > > and mark it as "Windows" in the [Components] field (that makes sure that > some relevant people get to see it). It's got a much better chance of > achieving traction if you can actually provide a code patch to implement > the behaviour. Failing that, at least make a good case which might > convince one of the developers that it would it be worth their while > implementing the change. I have tried to register with the link above so I can an issue with the Python Issue tracker but all attempts fail with: "Failed issue tracker submission An unexpected error occurred during the processing of your message. The tracker administrator is being notified."
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-10 11:38 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.1.1452425927.3151.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #101428 |
On 10/01/2016 05:18, Edward Diener wrote: > On 1/9/2016 11:03 AM, Tim Golden wrote: >> On 06/01/2016 00:48, Edward Diener wrote: >>> The Python launcher in Windows is a neat tool for running multiple >>> versions of Python 2 and Python 3 at different times. It allows as >>> options the ability to specify the latest version of either Python 2 or >>> Python 3 defaulting to the 64-bit version if both exist, or a specific >>> 32-bit or 64-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. What is missing is the >>> ability to specify the latest 32-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. >>> The equivalent syntax would be '-2-32' or '-3-32'. Is there some reason >>> why this option has been disallowed ? >> >> As far as I can remember, it's not so much a question of "disallowed" as >> just "not thought of by anyone". If you wanted this to go anywhere, >> could I suggest you create an issue on the Python issue tracker: >> >> http://bugs.python.org >> >> and mark it as "Windows" in the [Components] field (that makes sure that >> some relevant people get to see it). It's got a much better chance of >> achieving traction if you can actually provide a code patch to implement >> the behaviour. Failing that, at least make a good case which might >> convince one of the developers that it would it be worth their while >> implementing the change. > > I have tried to register with the link above so I can an issue with the > Python Issue tracker but all attempts fail with: > > "Failed issue tracker submission > > An unexpected error occurred during the processing > of your message. The tracker administrator is being > notified." Hmmm. Thanks for making the effort -- and for reporting back. I've just successfully registered a (dummy) account there, so it's possible that there was a temporary glitch. If you wouldn't mind trying once more, that would be helpful. If not, I can create the issue on your behalf, and inform the tracker admins. Thanks TJG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-10 16:09 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n6uh5l$g8f$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #101432 |
On 1/10/2016 6:38 AM, Tim Golden wrote: > > > On 10/01/2016 05:18, Edward Diener wrote: >> On 1/9/2016 11:03 AM, Tim Golden wrote: >>> On 06/01/2016 00:48, Edward Diener wrote: >>>> The Python launcher in Windows is a neat tool for running multiple >>>> versions of Python 2 and Python 3 at different times. It allows as >>>> options the ability to specify the latest version of either Python 2 or >>>> Python 3 defaulting to the 64-bit version if both exist, or a specific >>>> 32-bit or 64-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. What is missing is >>>> the >>>> ability to specify the latest 32-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. >>>> The equivalent syntax would be '-2-32' or '-3-32'. Is there some reason >>>> why this option has been disallowed ? >>> >>> As far as I can remember, it's not so much a question of "disallowed" as >>> just "not thought of by anyone". If you wanted this to go anywhere, >>> could I suggest you create an issue on the Python issue tracker: >>> >>> http://bugs.python.org >>> >>> and mark it as "Windows" in the [Components] field (that makes sure that >>> some relevant people get to see it). It's got a much better chance of >>> achieving traction if you can actually provide a code patch to implement >>> the behaviour. Failing that, at least make a good case which might >>> convince one of the developers that it would it be worth their while >>> implementing the change. >> >> I have tried to register with the link above so I can an issue with the >> Python Issue tracker but all attempts fail with: >> >> "Failed issue tracker submission >> >> An unexpected error occurred during the processing >> of your message. The tracker administrator is being >> notified." > > Hmmm. Thanks for making the effort -- and for reporting back. I've just > successfully registered a (dummy) account there, so it's possible that > there was a temporary glitch. > > If you wouldn't mind trying once more, that would be helpful. If not, I > can create the issue on your behalf, and inform the tracker admins. I tried again only to run into the exact same problem. I don't know what it means that I am not being allowed to register for the Python bug tracker. Needless to say the obscure error message is not telling me anything. Of course as a programmer who uses Python I would like to find out why I am not able to register. But in the meantime if you could create the issue on my behalf it would be appreciated. Thanks !
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Edward Diener <eldiener@tropicsoft.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-01-10 16:19 -0500 |
| Message-ID | <n6uhnv$i02$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #101432 |
On 1/10/2016 6:38 AM, Tim Golden wrote: > > > On 10/01/2016 05:18, Edward Diener wrote: >> On 1/9/2016 11:03 AM, Tim Golden wrote: >>> On 06/01/2016 00:48, Edward Diener wrote: >>>> The Python launcher in Windows is a neat tool for running multiple >>>> versions of Python 2 and Python 3 at different times. It allows as >>>> options the ability to specify the latest version of either Python 2 or >>>> Python 3 defaulting to the 64-bit version if both exist, or a specific >>>> 32-bit or 64-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. What is missing is >>>> the >>>> ability to specify the latest 32-bit version of Python 2 or Python 3. >>>> The equivalent syntax would be '-2-32' or '-3-32'. Is there some reason >>>> why this option has been disallowed ? >>> >>> As far as I can remember, it's not so much a question of "disallowed" as >>> just "not thought of by anyone". If you wanted this to go anywhere, >>> could I suggest you create an issue on the Python issue tracker: >>> >>> http://bugs.python.org >>> >>> and mark it as "Windows" in the [Components] field (that makes sure that >>> some relevant people get to see it). It's got a much better chance of >>> achieving traction if you can actually provide a code patch to implement >>> the behaviour. Failing that, at least make a good case which might >>> convince one of the developers that it would it be worth their while >>> implementing the change. >> >> I have tried to register with the link above so I can an issue with the >> Python Issue tracker but all attempts fail with: >> >> "Failed issue tracker submission >> >> An unexpected error occurred during the processing >> of your message. The tracker administrator is being >> notified." > > Hmmm. Thanks for making the effort -- and for reporting back. I've just > successfully registered a (dummy) account there, so it's possible that > there was a temporary glitch. > > If you wouldn't mind trying once more, that would be helpful. If not, I > can create the issue on your behalf, and inform the tracker admins. I was finally able to register so I will report this issue on the Python issue tracker myself.
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web