Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #26384 > unrolled thread
| Started by | rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2012-08-02 01:57 -0700 |
| Last post | 2012-08-02 02:50 -0700 |
| Articles | 9 — 3 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
C extension module doesn't throw exception after setting error indicator through PyErr_SetString() rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> - 2012-08-02 01:57 -0700
Re: C extension module doesn't throw exception after setting error indicator through PyErr_SetString() Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2012-08-02 10:06 +0100
Re: C extension module doesn't throw exception after setting error indicator through PyErr_SetString() rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> - 2012-08-02 02:21 -0700
Re: C extension module doesn't throw exception after setting error indicator through PyErr_SetString() rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> - 2012-08-02 02:21 -0700
Re: C extension module doesn't throw exception after setting error indicator through PyErr_SetString() Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2012-08-02 10:37 +0100
Re: C extension module doesn't throw exception after setting error indicator through PyErr_SetString() rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> - 2012-08-02 02:50 -0700
Re: C extension module doesn't throw exception after setting error indicator through PyErr_SetString() Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2012-08-02 11:45 +0100
Re: C extension module doesn't throw exception after setting error indicator through PyErr_SetString() Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2012-08-02 12:54 +0200
Re: C extension module doesn't throw exception after setting error indicator through PyErr_SetString() rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> - 2012-08-02 02:50 -0700
| From | rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-02 01:57 -0700 |
| Subject | C extension module doesn't throw exception after setting error indicator through PyErr_SetString() |
| Message-ID | <fa944ed7-8101-4b2f-a49a-363eb8d05d1d@googlegroups.com> |
I am implementing a C extension module, during this I saw that when I set the global error indicator and error message through PyErr_SetString() API and return false.
But it doesn't throw any error when I tried to check the error through sys.exc_info() then it returns (NULL, NULL, NULL) tuple.
When I return NULL through the C extension module's function then it works correctly and throws the exception as expected.
The skeleton looks like:
static PyObject* check(PyObject* sef, PyObject* args)
{
PyObject* input = NULL;
if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "O", &input)){
return NULL;
}
.....
.....
PyErr_SetString(PyExc_Exception, "Throwing Error through check function");
Py_RETURN_FALSE;
}
Any idea on why this is happening? Any help will be appreciated.
Thanks,
Rahul
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-02 10:06 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2856.1343898392.4697.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #26384 |
On 02/08/2012 09:57, rahul wrote:
> I am implementing a C extension module, during this I saw that when I
> set the global error indicator and error message through
> PyErr_SetString() API and return false.
>
> But it doesn't throw any error when I tried to check the error
> through sys.exc_info() then it returns (NULL, NULL, NULL) tuple.
>
> When I return NULL through the C extension module's function then it
> works correctly and throws the exception as expected.
>
> The skeleton looks like:
>
> static PyObject* check(PyObject* sef, PyObject* args) { PyObject*
> input = NULL; if (!PyArg_ParseTuple(args, "O", &input)){ return
> NULL; } ..... ..... PyErr_SetString(PyExc_Exception, "Throwing Error
> through check function"); Py_RETURN_FALSE; }
>
> Any idea on why this is happening? Any help will be appreciated.
Because you're returning False. You should be returning NULL. Which is
why it works when you do :)
Have a look at the first line of this page:
http://docs.python.org/py3k/extending/extending.html#intermezzo-errors-and-exceptions
Which piece of documentation led you to think that returning False was
the thing to do here? Perhaps there's a doc that needs fixing?
TJG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-02 02:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2858.1343899291.4697.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #26385 |
Hi TJG, The above link also doesn't strictly said that return value should be NULL only, it only said that usually NULL pointer used. No where I saw that it is nessasory t At http://docs.python.org/c-api/exceptions.html. it is written that "Most functions also return an error indicator, usually NULL if they are supposed to return a pointer, or -1 if they return an integer (exception: the PyArg_*() functions return 1 for success and 0 for failure)." this also told that usually NULL is used but we can change the return error indicator to any value. As like PyArg_*() used 0 for error value. Thanks, Rahul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-02 02:21 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <acb579e1-b716-46d9-b732-9dca094cedac@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #26385 |
Hi TJG, The above link also doesn't strictly said that return value should be NULL only, it only said that usually NULL pointer used. No where I saw that it is nessasory t At http://docs.python.org/c-api/exceptions.html. it is written that "Most functions also return an error indicator, usually NULL if they are supposed to return a pointer, or -1 if they return an integer (exception: the PyArg_*() functions return 1 for success and 0 for failure)." this also told that usually NULL is used but we can change the return error indicator to any value. As like PyArg_*() used 0 for error value. Thanks, Rahul
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-02 10:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2860.1343900238.4697.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #26388 |
On 02/08/2012 10:21, rahul wrote: > > Hi TJG, > > The above link also doesn't strictly said that return value should be > NULL only, it only said that usually NULL pointer used. No where I > saw that it is nessasory t > > At http://docs.python.org/c-api/exceptions.html. it is written that > "Most functions also return an error indicator, usually NULL if they > are supposed to return a pointer, or -1 if they return an integer > (exception: the PyArg_*() functions return 1 for success and 0 for > failure)." this also told that usually NULL is used but we can change > the return error indicator to any value. As like PyArg_*() used 0 for > error value. The docs you quote are very slightly confusing because they're combining the standard practice (return NULL), the uncommon alternative (return -1) and a few special cases present in the core functions. In short, any function you expose in an extension module will be returning a PyObject* and should return NULL if it is setting or cascading an exception. I'm not convinced that the docs need altering here: this is the first time I've come across anyone who was confused. But if you think some different wording might help, feel free to propose something. TJG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-02 02:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <d6e4ea1d-53cd-4a50-92ed-79a0b535dbd1@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #26390 |
When I use same code base for Python 3.x, then behavior is different. In this when I return false then also it throws exception but only when any other statement get executed after this
like below code:
...
...
b = None
try:
a = testModule.check(None)
except:
b = sys.exc_info()
then code execution doesn't come to except block.
But when I add one statement after calling check function then code execution goes into except block.
...
...
b = None
try:
a = testModule.check(None)
print( a )
except:
b = sys.exc_info()
On Thursday, 2 August 2012 15:07:08 UTC+5:30, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 02/08/2012 10:21, rahul wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Hi TJG,
>
> >
>
> > The above link also doesn't strictly said that return value should be
>
> > NULL only, it only said that usually NULL pointer used. No where I
>
> > saw that it is nessasory t
>
> >
>
> > At http://docs.python.org/c-api/exceptions.html. it is written that
>
> > "Most functions also return an error indicator, usually NULL if they
>
> > are supposed to return a pointer, or -1 if they return an integer
>
> > (exception: the PyArg_*() functions return 1 for success and 0 for
>
> > failure)." this also told that usually NULL is used but we can change
>
> > the return error indicator to any value. As like PyArg_*() used 0 for
>
> > error value.
>
>
>
> The docs you quote are very slightly confusing because they're combining
>
> the standard practice (return NULL), the uncommon alternative (return
>
> -1) and a few special cases present in the core functions.
>
>
>
> In short, any function you expose in an extension module will be
>
> returning a PyObject* and should return NULL if it is setting or
>
> cascading an exception.
>
>
>
> I'm not convinced that the docs need altering here: this is the first
>
> time I've come across anyone who was confused. But if you think some
>
> different wording might help, feel free to propose something.
>
>
>
> TJG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-02 11:45 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2865.1343904351.4697.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #26391 |
On 02/08/2012 10:50, rahul wrote: > When I use same code base for Python 3.x, then behavior is different. In this when I return false then also it throws exception but only when any other statement get executed after this > > like below code: > ... > ... > b = None > try: > a = testModule.check(None) > except: > b = sys.exc_info() > then code execution doesn't come to except block. > But when I add one statement after calling check function then code execution goes into except block. > > ... > ... > b = None > try: > a = testModule.check(None) > print( a ) > except: > b = sys.exc_info() Sounds like you're entering into undefined behaviour. If you set an exception and don't return NULL, you're leaving Python's internals in an inconsistent state. I don't know the internal code paths, but presumably in one version it just ignored the exception state while in the other it noticed it but in a different point in the code at which point it raised the exception. Or something. Long-and-short: return NULL from an extension module function once you've raised (or are cascading) an exception condition. Anything else is undefined unless you know *exactly* what you're doing. TJG
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-02 12:54 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2866.1343904911.4697.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #26391 |
rahul, 02.08.2012 11:50: > When I use same code base for Python 3.x, then behavior is different. You might want to take a look at Cython. It moves most of these "funny" little details off your shoulders. Stefan
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rahul <rahul03535@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-08-02 02:50 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.2861.1343901024.4697.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #26390 |
When I use same code base for Python 3.x, then behavior is different. In this when I return false then also it throws exception but only when any other statement get executed after this
like below code:
...
...
b = None
try:
a = testModule.check(None)
except:
b = sys.exc_info()
then code execution doesn't come to except block.
But when I add one statement after calling check function then code execution goes into except block.
...
...
b = None
try:
a = testModule.check(None)
print( a )
except:
b = sys.exc_info()
On Thursday, 2 August 2012 15:07:08 UTC+5:30, Tim Golden wrote:
> On 02/08/2012 10:21, rahul wrote:
>
> >
>
> > Hi TJG,
>
> >
>
> > The above link also doesn't strictly said that return value should be
>
> > NULL only, it only said that usually NULL pointer used. No where I
>
> > saw that it is nessasory t
>
> >
>
> > At http://docs.python.org/c-api/exceptions.html. it is written that
>
> > "Most functions also return an error indicator, usually NULL if they
>
> > are supposed to return a pointer, or -1 if they return an integer
>
> > (exception: the PyArg_*() functions return 1 for success and 0 for
>
> > failure)." this also told that usually NULL is used but we can change
>
> > the return error indicator to any value. As like PyArg_*() used 0 for
>
> > error value.
>
>
>
> The docs you quote are very slightly confusing because they're combining
>
> the standard practice (return NULL), the uncommon alternative (return
>
> -1) and a few special cases present in the core functions.
>
>
>
> In short, any function you expose in an extension module will be
>
> returning a PyObject* and should return NULL if it is setting or
>
> cascading an exception.
>
>
>
> I'm not convinced that the docs need altering here: this is the first
>
> time I've come across anyone who was confused. But if you think some
>
> different wording might help, feel free to propose something.
>
>
>
> TJG
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web