Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #2184 > unrolled thread
| Started by | CM <cmpython@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2011-03-29 10:19 -0700 |
| Last post | 2011-03-29 10:19 -0700 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: Directly Executable Files in Python CM <cmpython@gmail.com> - 2011-03-29 10:19 -0700
| From | CM <cmpython@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2011-03-29 10:19 -0700 |
| Subject | Re: Directly Executable Files in Python |
| Message-ID | <a9c433bd-4d45-4478-ab8c-e2a144530d02@b13g2000prf.googlegroups.com> |
> it has to be reproducing the byte code > interpreter in the code segment and the byte code in the data segment... > so that each .exe file created by said process is actually loading an > entire copy of at least the byte code interpreter with each program > "compiled" ... Yes, if you think of it as a handy packager and not a compiler, it makes sense. > can't be very efficient?? How do you define efficient? All I know is that it works well. You click on the .exe and a moment later you are running the application despite not having Python installed on your computer. I'm grateful for its existence. Che
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web