Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #49042 > unrolled thread
| Started by | jonathan.slenders@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| First post | 2013-06-24 05:30 -0700 |
| Last post | 2013-06-30 10:00 -0700 |
| Articles | 18 — 14 participants |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
Looking for a name for a deployment framework... jonathan.slenders@gmail.com - 2013-06-24 05:30 -0700
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-24 08:50 -0400
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2013-06-24 14:55 +0100
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2013-06-24 17:36 +0000
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 12:30 +0100
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> - 2013-06-24 18:13 +0000
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> - 2013-06-24 20:55 +0200
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-24 21:14 -0400
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> - 2013-06-24 20:08 +0100
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... jonathan.slenders@gmail.com - 2013-06-24 14:27 -0700
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2013-06-24 21:38 -0700
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... jonathan.slenders@gmail.com - 2013-06-25 03:08 -0700
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <ssm@fnord.no> - 2013-06-25 21:35 +0200
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> - 2013-06-25 22:16 -0400
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... xDog Walker <thudfoo@gmail.com> - 2013-06-25 20:32 -0700
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-06-26 07:40 -0400
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 11:38 +1000
Re: Looking for a name for a deployment framework... rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2013-06-30 10:00 -0700
| From | jonathan.slenders@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 05:30 -0700 |
| Subject | Looking for a name for a deployment framework... |
| Message-ID | <8b0d8931-cf02-4df4-8f17-a47ddd279d65@googlegroups.com> |
Hi all, Any suggestions for a good name, for a framework that does automatic server deployments? It's like Fabric, but more powerful. It has some similarities with Puppet, Chef and Saltstack, but is written in Python. Key points are that it uses Python, but is still very declarative and supports introspection. It supports parallel deployments, and interactivity. And it has a nice commandline shell with autocompletion for traversing the deployment tree. The repository: https://github.com/jonathanslenders/python-deployer/tree/refactoring-a-lot-v2 Suggestions welcome :) Jonathan
[toc] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 08:50 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <roy-BFD336.08501424062013@70-1-84-166.pools.spcsdns.net> |
| In reply to | #49042 |
In article <8b0d8931-cf02-4df4-8f17-a47ddd279d65@googlegroups.com>, jonathan.slenders@gmail.com wrote: > Hi all, > > Any suggestions for a good name, for a framework that does automatic server > deployments? > > It's like Fabric, but more powerful. > It has some similarities with Puppet, Chef and Saltstack, but is written in > Python. > > Key points are that it uses Python, but is still very declarative and > supports introspection. It supports parallel deployments, and interactivity. > And it has a nice commandline shell with autocompletion for traversing the > deployment tree. > > The repository: > https://github.com/jonathanslenders/python-deployer/tree/refactoring-a-lot-v2 > > > Suggestions welcome :) > Jonathan Without forming any opinion on the software itself, the best advice I can offer is that naming puns are very popular. If you're thinking of this as a fabric replacement, I would go with cloth, textile, material, gabardine, etc.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 14:55 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3748.1372082129.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49045 |
On 24/06/2013 13:50, Roy Smith wrote: > In article <8b0d8931-cf02-4df4-8f17-a47ddd279d65@googlegroups.com>, > jonathan.slenders@gmail.com wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Any suggestions for a good name, for a framework that does automatic server >> deployments? >> >> It's like Fabric, but more powerful. >> It has some similarities with Puppet, Chef and Saltstack, but is written in >> Python. >> >> Key points are that it uses Python, but is still very declarative and >> supports introspection. It supports parallel deployments, and interactivity. >> And it has a nice commandline shell with autocompletion for traversing the >> deployment tree. >> >> The repository: >> https://github.com/jonathanslenders/python-deployer/tree/refactoring-a-lot-v2 >> >> >> Suggestions welcome :) >> Jonathan > > Without forming any opinion on the software itself, the best advice I > can offer is that naming puns are very popular. If you're thinking of > this as a fabric replacement, I would go with cloth, textile, material, > gabardine, etc. > Snakeskin? Oh, I see that's already taken. :-(
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 17:36 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <b2redfFmdt3U1@mid.individual.net> |
| In reply to | #49047 |
On 2013-06-24, MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> wrote: > On 24/06/2013 13:50, Roy Smith wrote: >> In article <8b0d8931-cf02-4df4-8f17-a47ddd279d65@googlegroups.com>, >> jonathan.slenders@gmail.com wrote: >> >>> Hi all, >>> >>> Any suggestions for a good name, for a framework that does automatic server >>> deployments? >>> >>> It's like Fabric, but more powerful. >>> It has some similarities with Puppet, Chef and Saltstack, but is written in >>> Python. >>> >>> Key points are that it uses Python, but is still very declarative and >>> supports introspection. It supports parallel deployments, and interactivity. >>> And it has a nice commandline shell with autocompletion for traversing the >>> deployment tree. >>> >>> The repository: >>> https://github.com/jonathanslenders/python-deployer/tree/refactoring-a-lot-v2 >>> >>> >>> Suggestions welcome :) >>> Jonathan >> >> Without forming any opinion on the software itself, the best advice I >> can offer is that naming puns are very popular. If you're thinking of >> this as a fabric replacement, I would go with cloth, textile, material, >> gabardine, etc. > > Snakeskin? Oh, I see that's already taken. :-( Most things are taken nowadays. A short nonsense-word is best. Something like "Folaf". Yeah, it doesn't spark the imagination, but it's easy to find, if not to remember. Well, not "Folaf." That seems to be an African style restaurant in L.A. -- Neil Cerutti
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-25 12:30 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3808.1372159822.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49045 |
On 2013-06-24 13:50, Roy Smith wrote: > Without forming any opinion on the software itself, the best advice I > can offer is that naming puns are very popular. If you're thinking of > this as a fabric replacement, I would go with cloth, textile, material, > gabardine, etc. brocade -- Robert Kern "I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had an underlying truth." -- Umberto Eco
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 18:13 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <kqa28v$4us$1@dont-email.me> |
| In reply to | #49042 |
jonathan.slenders@gmail.com wrote: > Any suggestions for a good name, > for a framework that does > automatic server deployments ? asdf : automatic server deployment framework -- Stanley C. Kitching Human Being Phoenix, Arizona
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Irmen de Jong <irmen.NOSPAM@xs4all.nl> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 20:55 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <51c89629$0$15955$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl> |
| In reply to | #49060 |
On 24-6-2013 20:13, Cousin Stanley wrote: > jonathan.slenders@gmail.com wrote: > >> Any suggestions for a good name, >> for a framework that does >> automatic server deployments ? > > asdf : automatic server deployment framework > > :-) wsad: wonderful serverside automatic deployments (hm, could use a bit of tweaking, maybe FPS keys don't map easily to names) Irmen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 21:14 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <roy-11040F.21140024062013@70-1-84-166.pools.spcsdns.net> |
| In reply to | #49060 |
In article <kqa28v$4us$1@dont-email.me>, Cousin Stanley <cousinstanley@gmail.com> wrote: > jonathan.slenders@gmail.com wrote: > > > Any suggestions for a good name, > > for a framework that does > > automatic server deployments ? > > asdf : automatic server deployment framework I prefer: Quite Wonderful Electronic Rollout Tool
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Fábio Santos <fabiosantosart@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 20:08 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3755.1372100893.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49042 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On 24 Jun 2013 13:39, <jonathan.slenders@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Any suggestions for a good name, for a framework that does automatic server deployments? > > It's like Fabric, but more powerful. > It has some similarities with Puppet, Chef and Saltstack, but is written in Python. > > Key points are that it uses Python, but is still very declarative and supports introspection. It supports parallel deployments, and interactivity. And it has a nice commandline shell with autocompletion for traversing the deployment tree. > > The repository: > https://github.com/jonathanslenders/python-deployer/tree/refactoring-a-lot-v2 > > > Suggestions welcome :) > Jonathan omglolftwdeploy
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jonathan.slenders@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 14:27 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <a4ab5ee4-4e35-4adb-baae-106ef89fdea2@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #49066 |
Thanks everyone, I'll think about it. The main reason is that I'm working on the documentation, and this a a good opportunity to think about the naming. python-deploy-framework or python-deployer could be too boring.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-24 21:38 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3797.1372135133.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49042 |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] — view raw
On Jun 24, 2013 5:36 AM, <jonathan.slenders@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Any suggestions for a good name, for a framework that does automatic server deployments? > > It's like Fabric, but more powerful. > It has some similarities with Puppet, Chef and Saltstack, but is written in Python. Er, Salt is likewise written in Python. (Your statement seemed to imply otherwise.) Cheers, Chris
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | jonathan.slenders@gmail.com |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-25 03:08 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6deae5d9-c5d9-4e56-b521-a1ab70004911@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #49126 |
Le mardi 25 juin 2013 06:38:44 UTC+2, Chris Rebert a écrit : > Er, Salt is likewise written in Python. You're right. Salt is also Python, excuse me, and it's very powerful as well.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Stig Sandbeck Mathisen <ssm@fnord.no> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-25 21:35 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <878v1ynfur.fsf@dagon.fnord.no> |
| In reply to | #49042 |
jonathan.slenders@gmail.com writes: > Any suggestions for a good name, for a framework that does automatic > server deployments? Whatever you choose, make sure it is easily searchable. Googling for "puppet" and "chef" only recently gave relevant results for something not, er, doll or food related. It is not helpful that one of chef's tools is called "knife". Puns may be fun, (ok, puns _are_ fun, but don't ask my wife about that) but it'll be a pain to find information about the software. This _may_ hinder adoption, as helpful search results may be hard to find. Find something prononouncable, check it for "does not mean anything insulting to anyone's mother's genetics in whatever language", and do a quick search for it. The less results you get, the easier information about your software will be to find later. -- Stig Sandbeck Mathisen
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Dave Angel <davea@davea.name> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-25 22:16 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3873.1372213011.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49042 |
On 06/25/2013 03:38 PM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: > jonathan.slenders@gmail.com writes: > >> Any suggestions for a good name, for a framework that does automatic >> server deployments? > > Whatever you choose, make sure it is easily searchable. Googling for > "puppet" and "chef" only recently gave relevant results for something > not, er, doll or food related. It is not helpful that one of chef's > tools is called "knife". > > Puns may be fun, (ok, puns _are_ fun, but don't ask my wife about that) > but it'll be a pain to find information about the software. This _may_ > hinder adoption, as helpful search results may be hard to find. > > Find something prononouncable, check it for "does not mean anything > insulting to anyone's mother's genetics in whatever language", and do a > quick search for it. The less results you get, the easier information > about your software will be to find later. > OHHH, we've got another google-groups sucker. Please switch to something that works, that doesn't double-post (like your current message), and that doesn't double-space any quoting of previous messages. Google groups has been broken for a long time, though the details change from version to version. Learning to use it right is harder than switching to a simple mail client like Thunderbird. -- DaveA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | xDog Walker <thudfoo@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-25 20:32 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.3887.1372243292.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49042 |
On Tuesday 2013 June 25 19:16, Dave Angel wrote: > On 06/25/2013 03:38 PM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: > > jonathan.slenders@gmail.com writes: > >> Any suggestions for a good name, for a framework that does automatic > >> server deployments? Yet Another Deployment Framework? -- Yonder nor sorghum stenches shut ladle gulls stopper torque wet strainers.
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-26 07:40 -0400 |
| Message-ID | <roy-1DD37A.07400026062013@70-1-84-166.pools.spcsdns.net> |
| In reply to | #49246 |
In article <mailman.3887.1372243292.3114.python-list@python.org>, xDog Walker <thudfoo@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tuesday 2013 June 25 19:16, Dave Angel wrote: > > On 06/25/2013 03:38 PM, Stig Sandbeck Mathisen wrote: > > > jonathan.slenders@gmail.com writes: > > >> Any suggestions for a good name, for a framework that does automatic > > >> server deployments? > > Yet Another Deployment Framework? Boring. How about "Soliloquy". Then the project tag line could be, "Deploy, or not deploy, that is the question". For further hack value, require that all pull requests to the project be done entirely in iambic pentameter: for host in hosts: deploy(the_code).remote()
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-30 11:38 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.4016.1372556340.3114.python-list@python.org> |
| In reply to | #49248 |
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> wrote: > For further hack value, require that all pull requests to the project be > done entirely in iambic pentameter: > > for host in hosts: > deploy(the_code).remote() For further hack delight, require a patch Submitted for this code restrict itself To five feet, neither more nor less; iambs. But how should all those colons be pronounced? ChrisA
[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]
| From | rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2013-06-30 10:00 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <6a7a95ba-5bd0-4177-827a-d4179255ee21@googlegroups.com> |
| In reply to | #49470 |
On Sunday, June 30, 2013 7:08:51 AM UTC+5:30, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 9:40 PM, Roy Smith wrote: > > for host in hosts: > > deploy(the_code).remote() > > For further hack delight, require a patch > Submitted for this code restrict itself > To five feet, neither more nor less; iambs. > But how should all those colons be pronounced? Hear Hear I say! Thou causest sweet delight Chris with Roy; poets of this assembly
[toc] | [prev] | [standalone]
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web