Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #98691 > unrolled thread

Re: Classic OOP in Python

Started byjongiddy <jongiddy@gmail.com>
First post2015-11-12 03:03 -0800
Last post2015-11-12 03:03 -0800
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Classic OOP in Python jongiddy <jongiddy@gmail.com> - 2015-11-12 03:03 -0800

#98691 — Re: Classic OOP in Python

Fromjongiddy <jongiddy@gmail.com>
Date2015-11-12 03:03 -0800
SubjectRe: Classic OOP in Python
Message-ID<6b0d08b3-5599-4952-85d2-a43c72ee71b2@googlegroups.com>
On Thursday, 18 June 2015 12:21:29 UTC+1, Jason P.  wrote:
> 
> I'm aware of duck typing. The point in using interfaces is to be explicit about the boundaries of a system.
> 
> Quite a red "Growing Object-Oriented Software, Guided by Tests", by the way. In fact interfaces are key components in the style of building software they propose, in good company with TDD.
> 
> Thx!


Late to the party, but I have added a package `jute` to PyPI which provides interface checking closer to the model used in Java (and other compiled OO languages). See https://github.com/jongiddy/jute

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web