Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #94475 > unrolled thread

Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

Started byRick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com>
First post2015-07-23 15:49 -0700
Last post2015-07-23 15:49 -0700
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed? Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2015-07-23 15:49 -0700

#94475 — Re: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?

FromRick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com>
Date2015-07-23 15:49 -0700
SubjectRe: Should non-security 2.7 bugs be fixed?
Message-ID<69ec07d2-eae9-409c-b54a-ba0fccd47015@googlegroups.com>
On Wednesday, July 22, 2015 at 11:26:50 PM UTC-5, Jason Swails wrote:
> I know my experiences don't hold true for everybody, but I
> also don't think they are uncommon (I know several
> colleagues that share many aspects of them).  And for me,
> the *better* Python 2.7 becomes, and the longer it's kept
> around, the easier (and more fun!) it makes my transition
> to Python 3.  So for me at least, arguments like "don't
> make Python 2.7 too good or people won't switch" are not
> only wrong, but in actuality counter-productive.

Thanks for sharing your story. You offer a compelling
argument for maintaining Py2.x in peak condition for many 
years. 

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web