Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #106981
| Subject | Re: Serious error in int() function? |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| References | <52f7516c-8601-4252-ab16-bc30c59c8306@googlegroups.com> <570f3e30$0$665$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <Kr2dnVKiXPpT0JLKnZ2dnUU78TXNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> |
| From | blindanagram@nowhere.net |
| Date | 2016-04-14 09:13 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <zNSdna8abKekzJLKnZ2dnUU78fHNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> (permalink) |
On 14/04/2016 08:59, blindanagram@nowhere.net wrote: > On 14/04/2016 07:52, ast wrote: > This means that the result will be correct provided it has 53 or less > bits - just short of 16 decimal digits (i.e for square numbers with less > than 32 digits). > > With an integer square root function (isqrt), this program: > > for exp in count(20): > v = 2 ** exp - 1 > if isqrt(v) != sqrt(v): > print(exp, isqrt(v), sqrt(v)) > break > > terminates with: > > 54 18014398509481983 1.8014398509481982e+16 > > showing a first error for a 54 bit square root > I should also have said that the square root of integer squares with between 15 and 30 decimal digits will only be correct if the square numbers themselves are exactly representable in 53 bits. So we can expect failures for squares with 16 or more digits.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Serious error in int() function? martin.spichty@gmail.com - 2016-04-13 00:41 -0700
Re: Serious error in int() function? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-13 10:55 +0300
Re: Serious error in int() function? Alain Ketterlin <alain@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> - 2016-04-13 10:00 +0200
Re: Serious error in int() function? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-04-13 10:03 +0200
Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-13 09:04 +0100
Re: Serious error in int() function? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-04-13 23:51 +1200
Re: Serious error in int() function? "ast" <nomail@com.invalid> - 2016-04-14 08:52 +0200
Re: Serious error in int() function? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-04-14 09:25 +0200
Accuracy of math.sqrt(), was Re: Serious error in int() function? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-04-14 09:46 +0200
Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-14 08:59 +0100
Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-14 09:13 +0100
Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-14 13:07 +0100
Re: Serious error in int() function? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 20:36 -0400
Re: Serious error in int() function? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-04-15 04:38 +0200
Re: Serious error in int() function? John Pote <johnhpote@o2.co.uk> - 2016-04-15 12:05 +0100
Re: Serious error in int() function? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-04-15 11:50 +0000
Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-15 09:41 +0100
Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-15 09:41 +0100
csiph-web