Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #106981

Re: Serious error in int() function?

Subject Re: Serious error in int() function?
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
References <52f7516c-8601-4252-ab16-bc30c59c8306@googlegroups.com> <570f3e30$0$665$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <Kr2dnVKiXPpT0JLKnZ2dnUU78TXNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
From blindanagram@nowhere.net
Date 2016-04-14 09:13 +0100
Message-ID <zNSdna8abKekzJLKnZ2dnUU78fHNnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On 14/04/2016 08:59, blindanagram@nowhere.net wrote:
> On 14/04/2016 07:52, ast wrote:

> This means that the result will be correct provided it has 53 or less
> bits - just short of 16 decimal digits (i.e for square numbers with less
> than 32 digits).
> 
> With an integer square root function (isqrt), this program:
> 
> for exp in count(20):
>   v = 2 ** exp - 1
>   if isqrt(v) != sqrt(v):
>     print(exp, isqrt(v), sqrt(v))
>     break
> 
> terminates with:
> 
>   54 18014398509481983 1.8014398509481982e+16
> 
> showing a first error for a 54 bit square root
> 
I should also have said that the square root of integer squares with
between 15 and 30 decimal digits will only be correct if the square
numbers themselves are exactly representable in 53 bits.  So we can
expect failures for squares with 16 or more digits.


Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Serious error in int() function? martin.spichty@gmail.com - 2016-04-13 00:41 -0700
  Re: Serious error in int() function? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-04-13 10:55 +0300
  Re: Serious error in int() function? Alain Ketterlin <alain@universite-de-strasbourg.fr.invalid> - 2016-04-13 10:00 +0200
  Re: Serious error in int() function? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-04-13 10:03 +0200
  Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-13 09:04 +0100
  Re: Serious error in int() function? Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-04-13 23:51 +1200
  Re: Serious error in int() function? "ast" <nomail@com.invalid> - 2016-04-14 08:52 +0200
    Re: Serious error in int() function? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-04-14 09:25 +0200
    Accuracy of math.sqrt(), was Re: Serious error in int() function? Peter Otten <__peter__@web.de> - 2016-04-14 09:46 +0200
    Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-14 08:59 +0100
      Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-14 09:13 +0100
        Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-14 13:07 +0100
          Re: Serious error in int() function? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-04-14 20:36 -0400
            Re: Serious error in int() function? Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-04-15 04:38 +0200
              Re: Serious error in int() function? John Pote <johnhpote@o2.co.uk> - 2016-04-15 12:05 +0100
                Re: Serious error in int() function? alister <alister.ware@ntlworld.com> - 2016-04-15 11:50 +0000
            Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-15 09:41 +0100
              Re: Serious error in int() function? blindanagram@nowhere.net - 2016-04-15 09:41 +0100

csiph-web