Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #9615
| From | "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Python ++ Operator? |
| Date | 2011-07-16 11:55 +0200 |
| Organization | Mojito.pl |
| Message-ID | <uubx20tteoej.dlg@localhost.localdomain> (permalink) |
| References | <CAH+GN=3PDVnzEp7PJZk7y9BH=vbbsPs7UJoyRcJO3o2wCg-iag@mail.gmail.com> <CALG+76dizm12CbpOAzoC7U8x6N0OH3gfBR1OjgeLtDcgJ9y50w@mail.gmail.com> <CAPTjJmpAZsgqHvFvC5tvmLVw0OrNjrAr8v+hyCKeDVqyA-srpA@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.1077.1310764158.1164.python-list@python.org> |
Dnia Fri, 15 Jul 2011 23:09:02 +0200, Stefan Behnel napisał(a): [...] >> array[count++]=value; >> >> or the more direct pointer management: >> *ptr++=value; > > More direct, sure. But readable? Well, only when you know what this > specific pattern does. If you have to think about it, it may end up hurting > your eyes before you figure it out. Oh, come on. I don't say the post- and pre-incrementing is good or bad, but please don't exagerate. Almost any other construction is unreadable to people, who don't know this construction, eg. a==1, a+=1 may be completely senseless to mathematicians. Best regards, Waldek
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Python ++ Operator? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-07-15 23:09 +0200
Re: Python ++ Operator? "Waldek M." <wm@localhost.localdomain> - 2011-07-16 11:55 +0200
Re: Python ++ Operator? Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2011-07-16 11:13 -0500
Re: Python ++ Operator? Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-07-16 14:23 +0100
csiph-web