Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3"

From	Roy Smith <roy@panix.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3"
Date	2014-01-05 23:05 -0500
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Message-ID	<roy-F0F87E.23050105012014@news.panix.com> (permalink)
References	(1 earlier) <labmaj$8u2$1@ger.gmane.org> <lad05k$gf6$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmqBeoTLxXiKVcsvk395qgKt+Qv+jF_sOpzi7CgZmBjQcw@mail.gmail.com> <lad3ml$hgo$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.4998.1388975139.18130.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw

In article <mailman.4998.1388975139.18130.python-list@python.org>,
 Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> wrote:

> I honestly think Python3 will have to be regressed despite all the 
> [obscenity elided] about how "everyone's moving to Python 3 now".

This forum has seen a lot honest disagreement about issues, sometimes 
hotly debated.  That's OK.  Sometimes the discussion has not been 
completely professional, which is less than wonderful, but everything 
can't always be wonderful.

There is absolutely no reason, however, to resort to profanity.  That's 
just unacceptable.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Mark Janssen <dreamingforward@gmail.com> - 2014-01-05 20:25 -0600
  Re: "More About Unicode in Python 2 and 3" Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-01-05 23:05 -0500

csiph-web