Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #77298
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: suckitude classifications [was Re: Keeping python code and database in sync] |
| Date | 2014-08-29 19:19 -0400 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <roy-6F36E1.19191329082014@news.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.13604.1409316126.18130.python-list@python.org> <roy-AE646E.10535529082014@news.panix.com> <CANc-5UxEY4XgmoiNa5MR=1Hy8SeRtpr1r=rRjBFKw2RrxFNomQ@mail.gmail.com> <5400CE4C.8080209@stoneleaf.us> <mailman.13623.1409351910.18130.python-list@python.org> |
In article <mailman.13623.1409351910.18130.python-list@python.org>, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 30, 2014 at 5:02 AM, Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> wrote: > > Speaking of suckitude, we could classify technologies that way: > > > > xml: major suckitude > > > > rpc: no suckitude > > > > python: negative suckitude > > I disagree with your last two qualifications. RPC still sucks, just > not as much as some things do. Are we talking the generic concept of Remote Procedure Calls, or the specific implementation of Sun RPC? I'm surprised at the reaction to the word, as if it were something new. I thought the term has been in common parlance for many years. Contrast with winitude. Anyway, I think it is unfair to describe xml as major suckitude. True, it is somewhat outdated, with more modern alternatives such as JSON, YAML, protobuffers, etc. In its day, however, it was a breakthrough technology, even if only an incremental outgrowth of SGML.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Keeping python code and database in sync "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-08-29 14:42 +0200
Re: Keeping python code and database in sync Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-08-29 05:55 -0700
Re: Keeping python code and database in sync "Frank Millman" <frank@chagford.com> - 2014-08-29 15:19 +0200
Re: Keeping python code and database in sync Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-08-29 10:54 -0400
Re: Keeping python code and database in sync Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-08-29 12:04 -0500
suckitude classifications [was Re: Keeping python code and database in sync] Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-08-29 12:02 -0700
Re: Keeping python code and database in sync Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-08-30 06:34 +1000
Re: Keeping python code and database in sync Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-30 08:31 +1000
Re: suckitude classifications [was Re: Keeping python code and database in sync] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-30 08:38 +1000
Re: suckitude classifications [was Re: Keeping python code and database in sync] Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-08-29 19:19 -0400
Re: suckitude classifications [was Re: Keeping python code and database in sync] Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-30 09:38 +1000
Re: Keeping python code and database in sync Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> - 2014-08-29 18:47 -0500
Re: Keeping python code and database in sync Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-08-29 16:54 -0700
Re: Keeping python code and database in sync Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-08-29 21:14 -0500
Re: Keeping python code and database in sync Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-08-30 12:28 +1000
Re: suckitude classifications {taken to absurdity} Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-08-30 11:13 -0400
csiph-web