Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #17665
| From | Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? |
| Date | 2011-12-21 09:26 -0500 |
| Organization | PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC |
| Message-ID | <roy-23DCD1.09260421122011@news.panix.com> (permalink) |
| References | <jcqha6$mug$1@reader1.panix.com> <9lc2u5FilrU1@mid.individual.net> <jcqrtk$4g4$1@reader1.panix.com> <7xr4zzx8k9.fsf@ruckus.brouhaha.com> <9le7c5F1lsU1@mid.individual.net> |
In article <9le7c5F1lsU1@mid.individual.net>, Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> wrote: > On 2011-12-20, Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> wrote: > > Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> writes: > >> Oops. I should have mentioned this is for embedded systems > >> programming so templates in general (and STL in particular) > >> are probably off the table. > > > > Templates are how C++ does generics and I'd expect them to > > appear in be used in embedded programming as well as elsewhere. > > They can bloat up the code if you're not careful (if function f > > has several parameters, you can end up with a separate, > > specialized copy of f for every combination of types that f is > > called with in the program), but in the typical monomorphic > > situation they don't add any overhead. I'm not sure about the > > situation with STL. Anyway, templates aren't terribly hard to > > understand. > > Moreover, if you don't plan to take advantage of templates or > inheritance, then you could as well write C++ compatible C and be > pretty happy with the results. Well, C++ still gives you constructors, destructors, and the ability to write class-specific operators. But, you'd be missing one of C++'s biggest selling points; safe containers. Even if you never explore anything in STL beyond std:string and std:vector, you will have saved yourself a world of buffer overflow pain.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
[OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-20 17:40 +0000
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2011-12-20 18:36 +0000
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-20 20:41 +0000
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-12-20 13:00 -0800
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2011-12-21 14:04 +0000
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-12-21 09:26 -0500
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-21 15:37 +0000
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2011-12-21 16:16 +0000
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-21 21:02 +0000
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-12-21 13:15 -0800
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2011-12-21 20:02 -0500
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Neil Cerutti <neilc@norwich.edu> - 2011-12-22 13:19 +0000
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-12-20 11:43 -0800
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-12-20 20:51 +0000
Re: [OT] Quick intro to C++ for a Python and C user? Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-12-20 13:06 -0800
csiph-web