Re: obviscating python code for distribution

From	Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: obviscating python code for distribution
Date	2011-05-18 18:33 +0100
Organization	University of Bergen
Message-ID	<rgcda8-tor.ln1@svn.schaathun.net> (permalink)
References	<4DD08620.4030507@tysdomain.com> <mailman.1611.1305512463.9059.python-list@python.org> <op.vvlipenoa8ncjz@gnudebst> <5h9ca8-ekq.ln1@svn.schaathun.net> <mailman.1757.1305737674.9059.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On Wed, 18 May 2011 09:54:30 -0700, geremy condra
  <debatem1@gmail.com> wrote:
:  On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> wrote:
: > But then, nothing is secure in any absolute sense.
: 
:  If you're talking security and not philosophy, there is such a thing
:  as a secure system. As a developer you should aim for it.

You think so?  Please name one, and let us know how you know that it
is secure.

: > and thereby provides some level of security.
:
:  The on-the-ground reality is that it doesn't. Lack of access to the
:  source code has not kept windows or adobe acrobat or flash player
:  secure, and they have large full-time security teams, and as you might
:  imagine from the amount of malware floating around targeting those
:  systems there are a lot of people who have these skills in spades.

You are just demonstrating that it does not provide complete security,
something which I never argued against.

: > Obviously, if your threat sources are dedicated hackers or maybe MI5,
: > there is no point bothering with obfuscation, but if your threat source
: > is script kiddies, then it might be quite effective.
: 
:  On the theory that any attack model without an adversary is
:  automatically secure?

No, on the assumption that we were discussing real systems, real
threats, and practical solutions, rather than models and theory.
There will always be adversaries, but they have limited means, and 
limited interest in your system.  And the limits vary.  Any marginal 
control will stave off a few potential attackers who just could not 
be bothered.

In theory, you can of course talk about absolute security.  For
instance, one can design something like AES¹, which is secure in
a very limited, theoretical model.  However, to be of any practical
use, AES must be built into a system, interacting with other systems,
and the theory and skills to prove that such a system be secure simply 
has not been developed.

Why do you think Common Criteria have not yet specified frameworks
for the top levels of assurance?

¹ Advanced Encryption Standard
-- 
:-- Hans Georg

Thread

Re: obviscating python code for distribution Daniel Kluev <dan.kluev@gmail.com> - 2011-05-16 13:21 +1100
  Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Rhodri James" <rhodri@wildebst.demon.co.uk> - 2011-05-16 23:42 +0100
    Re: obviscating python code for distribution Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-18 08:36 +0100
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 17:42 +0300
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 09:54 -0700
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-18 18:33 +0100
          Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 12:07 -0700
            Re: obviscating python code for distribution Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-18 20:56 +0100
              Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 14:34 -0700
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-19 06:21 +0100
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-19 08:47 +0000
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-19 10:16 +0100
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 10:23 -0700
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-19 19:23 +0100
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 17:56 -0700
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-20 05:48 +0100
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-20 07:04 +0000
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Hans Georg Schaathun <hg@schaathun.net> - 2011-05-20 09:54 +0100
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-20 15:24 -0500
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 15:45 -0700
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-21 00:54 +0000
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-20 23:26 -0500
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-05-20 07:10 +0000
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 09:26 -0700
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-05-20 18:48 +0100
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 11:33 +1000
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 19:30 -0700
                Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-20 12:35 +1000
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 03:24 +1000
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution John Bokma <john@castleamber.com> - 2011-05-18 12:31 -0500
          Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 03:52 +1000
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 10:40 -0700
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 04:07 +1000
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution "Littlefield, Tyler" <tyler@tysdomain.com> - 2011-05-18 12:26 -0600
        Re: obviscating python code for distribution harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-18 21:54 -0500
          Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 10:50 -0700
            Re: obviscating python code for distribution harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-20 01:17 -0500
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 21:30 +0300
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution Dotan Cohen <dotancohen@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 21:31 +0300
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 04:37 +1000
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-05-19 04:49 +1000
      Re: obviscating python code for distribution geremy condra <debatem1@gmail.com> - 2011-05-18 14:47 -0700

csiph-web