Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #6941
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!nntpfeed.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!reader02.news.zen.co.uk.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> |
| Subject | Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... |
| Date | Fri, 03 Jun 2011 14:07:43 +0100 |
| User-Agent | Pan/0.14.2 (This is not a psychotic episode. It's a cleansing moment of clarity.) |
| Message-Id | <pan.2011.06.03.13.07.40.156000@nowhere.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| References | <Fa0Fp.18193$pi2.16608@newsfe11.iad> <mailman.2325.1306861916.9059.python-list@python.org> <x2cFp.1746$QL2.985@newsfe04.iad> <mailman.2343.1306883665.9059.python-list@python.org> <crfFp.19078$pi2.10707@newsfe11.iad> <mailman.2374.1306948289.9059.python-list@python.org> <2_AFp.30000$241.24052@newsfe07.iad> <4de71c42$0$29983$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <87zkm0qyze.fsf@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> <94qlhsFkriU1@mid.individual.net> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8bit |
| Lines | 57 |
| Organization | Zen Internet |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 967b4d4e.news.zen.co.uk |
| X-Trace | DXC=S^gAiW6ken`ko]em;Y=Pd`YjZGX^207Pk`<MJMoM3PFm8UPL;5Cn`7aFJHPa[N739`S0aF49;C82`GUK\SEnB<7a |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@zen.co.uk |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:6941 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Fri, 03 Jun 2011 11:43:54 +1200, Gregory Ewing wrote: >> But going against generally accepted semantics should at least >> be clearly indicated. Lambda is one of the oldest computing abstraction, >> and they are at the core of any functional programming language. > > Yes, and Python's lambdas behave exactly the *same* way as > every other language's lambdas in this area. Changing it to > do early binding would be "going against generally accepted > semantics". In Lisp, it depends upon whether the free variable is bound: $ clisp [1]> (setq f (lambda (x) (+ x i))) #<FUNCTION :LAMBDA (X) (+ X I)> [2]> (setq i 7) 7 [3]> (apply f (list 4)) 11 [4]> (setq i 12) 12 [5]> (apply f (list 4)) 16 ^D $ clisp [1]> (let ((i 7)) (setq f (lambda (x) (+ x i)))) #<FUNCTION :LAMBDA (X) (+ X I)> [2]> (apply f (list 4)) 11 [3]> (setq i 12) 12 [4]> (apply f (list 4)) 11 ^D If the variable is bound, then the lambda creates a closure. And Python behaves the same way: > f = (lambda i: lambda x: x + i)(7) > f(4) 11 > i = 12 > f(4) 11 # If you really want a "let", this syntax is closer: # f = (lambda i = 7: lambda x: x + i)() The original semantics (from the lambda calculus) don't deal with the concept of mutable state. > If anything should be changed here, it's the for-loop, not lambda. Right. The for loop should bind the variable rather than set it.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-31 01:48 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-05-31 00:00 -0700
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-31 01:35 -0600
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2011-05-31 13:08 +0300
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-05-31 12:48 +0200
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2011-05-31 15:15 +0300
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-05-31 13:11 -0400
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-31 15:18 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-31 16:24 -0600
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-05-31 19:14 -0400
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-31 19:09 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-01 13:11 -0400
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-06-01 19:40 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-06-01 19:50 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-06-02 04:37 +0000
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-06-02 05:14 +0000
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-02 18:02 +1000
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-06-02 13:00 +0200
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2011-06-02 15:51 +0300
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-02 15:43 -0400
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-06-03 11:43 +1200
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-06-02 19:24 -0700
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2011-06-03 09:17 +0300
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-06-05 03:54 -0700
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2011-06-05 15:03 +0300
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-06-05 05:26 -0700
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2011-06-05 16:10 +0300
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-06-03 10:30 +0200
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-03 11:53 -0600
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Alain Ketterlin <alain@dpt-info.u-strasbg.fr> - 2011-06-03 12:35 +0200
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Jussi Piitulainen <jpiitula@ling.helsinki.fi> - 2011-06-03 14:07 +0300
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-06-03 15:38 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-06-04 12:40 +1200
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Nobody <nobody@nowhere.com> - 2011-06-03 14:07 +0100
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-06-02 10:44 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-06-02 10:55 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-06-02 17:22 +0000
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-06-02 11:43 -0600
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2011-06-02 02:02 -0400
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-06-02 11:02 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Martin Manns <mmanns@gmx.net> - 2011-05-31 23:14 +0200
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-05-31 15:47 -0600
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Martin Manns <mmanns@gmx.net> - 2011-06-01 02:57 +0200
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-31 16:53 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... harrismh777 <harrismh777@charter.net> - 2011-05-31 17:06 -0500
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-01 08:39 +1000
Re: Something is rotten in Denmark... Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-06-01 08:40 +1000
csiph-web