Re: Encapsulation in Python

From	BartC <bc@freeuk.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Encapsulation in Python
Date	2016-03-15 01:10 +0000
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<nc7n8k$qru$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References	(11 earlier) <mailman.133.1457994074.12893.python-list@python.org> <nc7ef9$sgf$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.137.1457997645.12893.python-list@python.org> <nc7it9$ejq$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.140.1458001784.12893.python-list@python.org>

Show all headers | View raw

On 15/03/2016 00:28, Mark Lawrence wrote:
> On 14/03/2016 23:56, BartC wrote:

>> Anything so terrible about that that Python needs to keep well clear of
>> or that you think its users should be deprived of?
>
> Yes, it is not even valid Python.  Switch has been rejected via at least
> one PEP and from what I see it adds nothing to the language, so let's
> deprive it from people who clearly don't need it in the first place.

Every time you need to test X against more than one other value, then 
you have a potential use for switch.

But yes you can do without switch if you have too. Same for many features.

> I am only rude to people such as yourself who refuse to provide code, in
> fact anything, to support your case.  Your "benchmark" for the switch
> was yet another laughable farce, which only tested the function calls,
> building tuples, running loops, there was nothing to test with respect
> to the actual switch which was meant to be tested.  So just in case you
> missed it above, where is the profile for this test?

I've shown the task. I'm sure you can also do some tests and show us 
some results.

>> I agree with you. But once you've got the language right, then there's
>> no harm looking at performance. A switch statement like the above can be
>> executed in a single byte-code.
>>
>
> Really?  Then please show us all just how it can be done via a patch to
> the cPython code on the bug tracker.

The one-byte-code switch works when all case expressions are known at 
compile-time. It makes use of a jump-table within the byte-code.

The total sequence will be more than one byte-code, typically:

LOAD_FAST                The index
SWITCH                   Jump to the right label
....
L5:                      One of multiple labels
  ...                     Deal with the code in this branch
JUMP_ABSOLUTE            Break out of the switch

...                      Provision is needed for the jump-table

But only one is needed for testing and dispatch. Now I've sketched it 
out, perhaps you can fill in the details for yourself... (I'm not 
getting involved in CPython development.)

-- 
Bartc

Thread

Re: Encapsulation in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 08:27 -0700
  Re: Encapsulation in Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-10 16:45 -0800
    Re: Encapsulation in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 08:47 -0700
      Re: Encapsulation in Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 18:39 -0800
        Re: Encapsulation in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 09:44 -0700
          Re: Encapsulation in Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 19:11 -0800
          Re: Encapsulation in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-13 21:11 +1100
            Re: Encapsulation in Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 10:32 -0700
              Re: Encapsulation in Python Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 15:09 -0600
              Re: Encapsulation in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-14 21:23 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-14 22:07 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-14 22:20 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-14 22:40 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-14 23:19 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-14 23:56 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:12 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-15 00:54 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:58 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-15 01:22 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 13:02 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-15 00:28 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-15 01:10 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 12:23 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-15 04:41 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python rurpy@yahoo.com - 2016-03-14 17:17 -0700
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:25 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-15 13:06 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 13:14 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-15 13:40 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 21:08 -0700
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-15 00:47 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-15 13:46 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-15 11:56 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-15 04:36 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-03-15 13:01 +1100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2016-03-15 04:45 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2016-03-15 22:02 +0100
                Re: Encapsulation in Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-16 00:39 +0000
                Re: Encapsulation in Python BartC <bc@freeuk.com> - 2016-03-16 22:58 +0000
        Re: Encapsulation in Python sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2016-03-14 11:11 -0700
          Re: Encapsulation in Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 23:09 -0700
      Re: Encapsulation in Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-11 18:56 -0800
    Re: Encapsulation in Python Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-03-12 13:52 +1300
      Re: Encapsulation in Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 08:49 -0800
        Re: Encapsulation in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 08:10 +1100
          Re: Encapsulation in Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-12 19:36 -0800
            Re: Encapsulation in Python Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-13 15:05 +1100
        Re: Encapsulation in Python Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2016-03-14 12:35 +1300
          Re: Encapsulation in Python Rick Johnson <rantingrickjohnson@gmail.com> - 2016-03-14 15:55 -0700

csiph-web