Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #25402
| From | Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Diagramming code |
| Date | 2012-07-16 09:58 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <n6ucd9-srr.ln1@satorlaser.homedns.org> (permalink) |
| References | <jtvqkt$5ll$1@dont-email.me> <mailman.2156.1342402742.4697.python-list@python.org> <jtvsec$d4b$1@dont-email.me> |
Am 16.07.2012 03:57, schrieb hamilton: > OK then, let me ask, how do you guys learn/understand large projects ? 1. Use the program. This gives you an idea what features are there and a bit how it could be structured. 2. Build the program, to see what is done to get the program running. This should give you an idea what pieces there are and where they are [from]. 3. Read design documentation (which is too often outdated) which should give you an idea what the intention of the project's structure is. 4. Read the code documentation (which is hopefully more up to date). This should give you an idea about responsibilities within the code. 5. Read the code itself. This can also be done while single-stepping through it with a debugger, just to see it run. Of course there are also secondary resources like developers' and users' mailinglists, websites, bugtrackers that provide information and help. Sometimes, drawing a few diagrams from steps 3 and 4 to document relationships between things is helpful. IMHO having a text describing the relationships in prose is superior to that though. In particular a diagram can't describe the rationale for something, you need prose for that. HTH & YMMV Uli
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Diagramming code hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-07-15 19:26 -0600
Re: Diagramming code Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-07-15 18:38 -0700
Re: Diagramming code hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-07-15 19:57 -0600
Re: Diagramming code Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2012-07-15 19:13 -0700
Re: Diagramming code Ulrich Eckhardt <ulrich.eckhardt@dominolaser.com> - 2012-07-16 09:58 +0200
Re: Diagramming code Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick@gmail.com> - 2012-07-16 05:00 -0400
RE: Diagramming code "Sells, Fred" <fred.sells@adventistcare.org> - 2012-07-16 13:02 -0400
Re: Diagramming code hamilton <hamilton@nothere.com> - 2012-07-16 12:36 -0600
Re: Diagramming code Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-07-16 13:51 -0400
Re: Diagramming code 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-17 07:11 -0700
Re: Diagramming code 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2012-07-17 07:11 -0700
Re: Diagramming code Miki Tebeka <miki.tebeka@gmail.com> - 2012-07-16 12:47 -0700
Re: Diagramming code Andrea Crotti <andrea.crotti.0@gmail.com> - 2012-07-16 21:41 +0100
Re: Diagramming code Andrew Cooper <amc96@cam.ac.uk> - 2012-07-16 23:24 +0100
csiph-web