Re: Automating build from source (was: Automating Sphinx generated documentation)

Path	csiph.com!optima2.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!nntp.club.cc.cmu.edu!micro-heart-of-gold.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!panix!not-for-mail
From	Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Subject	Re: Automating build from source (was: Automating Sphinx generated documentation)
Date	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:09:05 +0000 (UTC)
Organization	PANIX Public Access Internet and UNIX, NYC
Lines	13
Message-ID	<mth9eh$h5l$1@reader1.panix.com> (permalink)
References	<41302A7145AC054FA7A96CFD03835A0A0B9D749B@EX10MBX02.EU.NEC.COM> <85vbb84nym.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <mtgc84$ppb$1@ger.gmane.org> <mailman.34.1442587368.16376.python-list@python.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host	67-130-15-94.dia.static.qwest.net
X-Trace	reader1.panix.com 1442588945 17589 67.130.15.94 (18 Sep 2015 15:09:05 GMT)
X-Complaints-To	abuse@panix.com
NNTP-Posting-Date	Fri, 18 Sep 2015 15:09:05 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent	slrn/1.0.2 (Linux)
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:96824

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2015-09-18, John Wong <gokoproject@gmail.com> wrote:

> if you are okay with cloning a huge repository then I don't see a problem.

Ah yes, if the repository got cloned a lot that would be a problem. 
The repository in question doesn't get cloned (it does get backed up).
As I mentioned, it's subversion.  Subversion isn't a distributed VCS
like git.  Subversion uses a single, central repository.

-- 
Grant Edwards               grant.b.edwards        Yow! Are we laid back yet?
                                  at               
                              gmail.com

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: Automating build from source (was: Automating Sphinx generated documentation) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-09-18 15:09 +0000

csiph-web