Re: Functional style programming in python: what will you talk about if you have an hour on this topic?

Path	csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.033
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 0.93; 'S': 0.00; 'python.': 0.04; 'terry': 0.07; 'wed,': 0.12; 'subject:python': 0.12; 'am,': 0.13; 'wrote:': 0.15; 'assertion': 0.16; 'iterators,': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'style,': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:topic': 0.16; 'protocol': 0.16; 'functions,': 0.19; 'seems': 0.20; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'format,': 0.25; '(e.g.': 0.25; 'changing': 0.28; 'effect': 0.28; 'all,': 0.28; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; 'definition': 0.30; 'style.': 0.30; 'equivalent': 0.31; 'functional': 0.31; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'list': 0.32; 'actually': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.38; 'received:209.85.161': 0.38; 'received:209.85': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'common': 0.39; 'data': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:209': 0.40; 'subject:will': 0.64; 'property': 0.65; 'therefore,': 0.66; 'contrary': 0.67; 'subject:have': 0.74; 'subject:this': 0.74; 'hand,': 0.76; 'subject:you': 0.81; 'masking': 0.84; 'notion': 0.84; 'xah': 0.84
DKIM-Signature	v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=dRiXFwwCxoeEbtZ5fO8lVbRqC/2AsHSNfAnAYD/TDyI=; b=lMl+ub31hfZdqpX8NO7waJHRINa++JrzM1pYfe8ZY/BRlzSnZQgyHEefWsdjwxGgo7 98csOfBaQeUYOSEvqirgzHFVb94PO3F/SC7PRzp3bVc4efiHofyo/ps2XMeYfMv80r3y fDe30BTkKPTwkvUvjEXRMWnlY0Wj98+YV3GDg=
MIME-Version	1.0
In-Reply-To	<ivkh5u$eo$1@dough.gmane.org>
References	<2b28da74-f054-4f46-8971-43603ab7cfd3@glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com> <ivkh5u$eo$1@dough.gmane.org>
From	Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date	Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:09:16 -0600
Subject	Re: Functional style programming in python: what will you talk about if you have an hour on this topic?
To	python-list@python.org
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.998.1310576988.1164.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	15
NNTP-Posting-Host	2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace	1310576988 news.xs4all.nl 23848 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:36110
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:9414

Show key headers only | View raw

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
> The iteration protocol and the notion of iteraables as the common data
> exchange format, with associated notions of iterators, generator functions,
> and generators, are important features of Python. Not really functional
> style, I guess.

Xah Lee's assertion to the contrary notwithstanding, it seems to me
that list comprehensions are basically functional in style.  They are,
after all, equivalent to "map(f, filter(g, x))".

Iterators, on the other hand, by definition have the property that
each call to iter.next() has the side effect of changing the
iterator's state.  Therefore, although they can effectively be used as
a functional building block (e.g. by masking their use with a
comprehension), the iterators themselves are not actually functional.

Thread

csiph-web