Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #56661
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests |
| Date | 2013-10-11 04:25 -0400 |
| References | <525768a5$0$29984$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <20131011031319.GA30742@cskk.homeip.net> <l38c6t$g26$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.993.1381480211.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 10/11/2013 4:17 AM, Terry Reedy wrote: > On 10/10/2013 11:13 PM, Cameron Simpson wrote: >> On 11Oct2013 02:55, Steven D'Aprano >> <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > >>> def undecorate(f): >>> """Return the undecorated inner function from function f.""" >>> return f.func_closure[0].cell_contents >> >> Whereas this feels like black magic. Is this portable to any decorated >> function? If so, I'd have hoped it was in the stdlib. If not: black >> magic. >> >>> And in use: >>> >>> py> f(100) >>> 201 >>> py> undecorate(f)(100) >>> 200 >> >> All lovely, provided you can convince me that undecorate() is robust. >> (And if you can, I'll certainly be filing it away in my funcutils >> module for later use.) > > It only works if the decorator returns a closure with the original > function as the first member (of func_closure). Often true, but not at > all a requirement. > -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Skipping decorators in unit tests Gilles Lenfant <gilles.lenfant@gmail.com> - 2013-10-10 07:00 -0700
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-10-11 09:12 +1100
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 02:55 +0000
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-10-11 14:13 +1100
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-10-11 04:36 +0000
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-10-11 04:23 -0400
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2013-10-11 14:42 +1100
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-10-11 04:17 -0400
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-10-11 04:25 -0400
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-10-11 04:32 -0400
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2013-10-11 10:51 -0700
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-10-10 19:44 -0400
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-10-10 21:12 -0400
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Gilles Lenfant <gilles.lenfant@gmail.com> - 2013-10-11 02:37 -0700
Re: Skipping decorators in unit tests Cameron Simpson <cs@zip.com.au> - 2013-10-12 08:38 +1100
csiph-web