Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #35011
| Date | 2012-12-17 14:09 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> |
| Subject | Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory |
| References | <c2b15410-12e0-4645-a77f-9944bfd674a8@googlegroups.com> <CAHVvXxRpG8HDbboCPTuuhMNhZYjewScQW8um1Wz9e90Uv5mQag@mail.gmail.com> <50CF6731.3070705@cs.wisc.edu> <CAHVvXxRxD=vvnSo3YusrD-Vi==joOfO0Asy-AZ94rMC0ngz2cg@mail.gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.989.1355774986.29569.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On 12/17/2012 01:50 PM, Oscar Benjamin wrote: > On 17 December 2012 18:40, Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> wrote: >> On 12/17/2012 09:52 AM, Oscar Benjamin wrote: >>> https://github.com/benhoyt/betterwalk >> >> This is very useful to know about; thanks. >> >> I actually wrote something very similar on my own (I wanted to get >> information about whether each directory entry was a file, directory, >> symlink, etc. without separate stat() calls). > > The initial goal of betterwalk seemed to be the ability to do os.walk > with fewer stat calls. I think the information you want is part of > what betterwalk finds "for free" from the underlying OS iteration > (without the need to call stat()) but I'm not sure. Yes, that's my impression as well. >> (Also just for the record and anyone looking for other posts, I'd guess >> said discussion was on Python-dev. I don't look at even remotely >> everything on python-list (there's just too much), but I do skim most >> subject lines and I haven't noticed any discussion on it before now.) > > Actually, it was python-ideas: > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.ideas/17932 > http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.python.ideas/17757 Thanks again for the pointers; I'll have to go through that thread. It's possible I can contribute something; it sounds like at least at one point the implementation was ctypes-based and is sometimes slower, and I have both a (now-defunct) C implementation and my current Cython module. Ironically I haven't actually benchmarked mine. :-) Evan
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Iterating over files of a huge directory Gilles Lenfant <gilles.lenfant@gmail.com> - 2012-12-17 07:28 -0800
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-18 02:41 +1100
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Paul Rudin <paul.nospam@rudin.co.uk> - 2012-12-17 17:27 +0000
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2012-12-17 18:29 +0000
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2012-12-18 08:10 +1100
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Tim Golden <mail@timgolden.me.uk> - 2012-12-17 15:48 +0000
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2012-12-17 15:52 +0000
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Gilles Lenfant <gilles.lenfant@gmail.com> - 2012-12-17 08:06 -0800
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Gilles Lenfant <gilles.lenfant@gmail.com> - 2012-12-17 08:06 -0800
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory marduk <marduk@python.net> - 2012-12-17 10:50 -0500
Re: Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-12-17 12:40 -0600
Re: Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Oscar Benjamin <oscar.j.benjamin@gmail.com> - 2012-12-17 19:50 +0000
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2012-12-17 14:09 -0600
Re: Iterating over files of a huge directory Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-12-17 16:27 -0500
csiph-web