Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #71129
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!goblin2!goblin.stu.neva.ru!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.044 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.91; '*S*': 0.00; 'explicit': 0.07; 'returned.': 0.07; 'iterate': 0.09; 'subject:skip:c 10': 0.09; 'def': 0.12; '12:57': 0.16; 'executor': 0.16; 'generator.': 0.16; 'guessing': 0.16; 'iterable': 0.16; 'iterable,': 0.16; 'itertools': 0.16; 'messy': 0.16; 'proceeds': 0.16; 'uncommon': 0.16; 'discussions': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'seems': 0.21; 'memory': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'helpful': 0.24; '>': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'tried': 0.27; 'testing': 0.29; 'involving': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; 'submitting': 0.31; '100000': 0.31; 'complete,': 0.31; 'fine,': 0.31; 'skip:c 30': 0.32; 'run': 0.32; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; "can't": 0.35; 'offered': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; 'good.': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'done,': 0.36; 'yield': 0.36; 'done': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'skip:& 10': 0.38; 'problems': 0.38; 'follows:': 0.38; 'tasks': 0.38; 'handle': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.38; 'skip:& 20': 0.39; 'though,': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'results.': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'entire': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'show': 0.63; 'such': 0.63; 'more': 0.64; 'tasks.': 0.68; 'results': 0.69; 'skip:r 30': 0.69; 'futures?': 0.84; 'think:': 0.84; 'toy': 0.84; 'trick,': 0.84; 'workers,': 0.84; 'lazy': 0.91 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=yuseXlByqxgrOB/B7plXp0cAIWY5phUEq5nVwjUXGZs=; b=TD53JmkI88HX3KJM6CaAOFEUBxyeZKxyCApTPQMfkzkmR5hiMa2XEioDcWiA5K3Vxq Ybki51SiB0WeCoXeAGXkEcY+FRgxMnwUql1oZb6iyUGq33uTllV+7tUwUOPFtywD/JC1 UIb9shOdWGAdz47vQu467bNKkHKLM8NCkDeQAKSZ2e1UnVhNjHugbhR+wJRQkP1xl8KV 6SPT4mnGkdcHvJbcdeLNp0/F0dSaVBnTdfpjrtIKtiYT/PYP4BnklpFNzFXSEtTmCGcF PXcR9zBS9kicdruMmQ7cEoovhTEz9OHWWaUcvs3qqozSWDBC1vCZuAKlPA+0dAMvzll6 D/Lw== |
| X-Received | by 10.66.240.70 with SMTP id vy6mr11760573pac.80.1399581908907; Thu, 08 May 2014 13:45:08 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <536BD338.4070004@andros.org.uk> |
| References | <536BD338.4070004@andros.org.uk> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Thu, 8 May 2014 14:44:28 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: Real-world use of concurrent.futures |
| To | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b15aba983be7d04f8e98e4c |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.9797.1399581918.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 104 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1399581918 news.xs4all.nl 2878 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:38541 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:71129 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
On May 8, 2014 12:57 PM, "Andrew McLean" <lists@andros.org.uk> wrote:
> So far so good. However, I thought this would be an opportunity to
> explore concurrent.futures and to see whether it offered any benefits
> over the more explicit approach discussed above. The problem I am having
> is that all the discussions I can find of the use of concurrent.futures
> show use with toy problems involving just a few tasks. The url
> downloader in the documentation is typical, it proceeds as follows:
>
> 1. Get an instance of concurrent.futuresThreadPoolExecutor
> 2. Submit a few tasks to the executer
> 3. Iterate over the results using concurrent.futures.as_completed
>
> That's fine, but I suspect that isn't a helpful pattern if I have a very
> large number of tasks. In my case I could run out of memory if I tried
> submitting all of the tasks to the executor before processing any of the
> results.
I thought that ThreadPoolExecutor.map would handle this transparently if
you passed it a lazy iterable such as a generator. From my testing though,
that seems not to be the case; with a generator of 100000 items and a pool
of 2 workers, the entire generator was consumed before any results were
returned.
> I'm guessing what I want to do is, submit tasks in batches of perhaps a
> few hundred, iterate over the results until most are complete, then
> submit some more tasks and so on. I'm struggling to see how to do this
> elegantly without a lot of messy code just there to do "bookkeeping".
> This can't be an uncommon scenario. Am I missing something, or is this
> just not a job suitable for futures?
I don't think it needs to be "messy". Something like this should do the
trick, I think:
from concurrent.futures import *
from itertools import islice
def batched_pool_runner(f, iterable, pool, batch_size):
it = iter(iterable)
# Submit the first batch of tasks.
futures = set(pool.submit(f, x) for x in islice(it, batch_size))
while futures:
done, futures = wait(futures, return_when=FIRST_COMPLETED)
# Replenish submitted tasks up to the number that completed.
futures.update(pool.submit(f, x) for x in islice(it, len(done)))
yield from done
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Real-world use of concurrent.futures Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-05-08 14:44 -0600
csiph-web