Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #22150

Re: Inconsistency between os.getgroups and os.system('groups') after os.setgroups()

Path csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <3beezer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.033
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 0.93; '*S*': 0.00; 'suppress': 0.07; 'postfix': 0.09; 'subject:()': 0.09; 'to:addr:comp.lang.python': 0.09; 'discusses': 0.16; 'history;': 0.16; 'mechanisms,': 0.16; 'privilege': 0.16; 'setgid': 0.16; 'subject:between': 0.16; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.16; '25,': 0.19; 'later': 0.19; 'wrote:': 0.20; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.21; '(i.e.,': 0.21; 'discussion': 0.22; 'sunday,': 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'url:edu': 0.25; 'says': 0.25; '(in': 0.26; '(which': 0.26; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.27; 'cc:2**0': 0.29; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.30; "can't": 0.31; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.32; 'instead': 0.32; '---': 0.33; 'membership': 0.33; 'received:209.85': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'processes': 0.34; 'groups,': 0.35; 'root': 0.35; 'running': 0.35; 'received:209': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'implement': 0.38; 'doing': 0.38; 'possible': 0.39; 'using': 0.40; 'march': 0.63; 'rights': 0.66; 'url:u': 0.67; 'yourself': 0.68; '2012': 0.74; 'mechanism.': 0.84; 'os.system': 0.84; 'separation': 0.84; 'subject:groups': 0.84; 'trick.': 0.84; 'drops': 0.91
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Date Sun, 25 Mar 2012 16:33:59 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To <mailman.973.1332713242.3037.python-list@python.org>
Complaints-To groups-abuse@google.com
Injection-Info glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=24.9.68.28; posting-account=gr_YLgoAAAAnxbkitFI4LHjYolWPI16O
References <19158239.1073.1332711120749.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@ynlx41> <mailman.973.1332713242.3037.python-list@python.org>
User-Agent G2/1.0
X-Google-Web-Client true
MIME-Version 1.0
Subject Re: Inconsistency between os.getgroups and os.system('groups') after os.setgroups()
From jeff <3beezer@gmail.com>
To comp.lang.python@googlegroups.com
Content-Type text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Message-ID <mailman.975.1332718443.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 29
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1332718443 news.xs4all.nl 6968 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:53688
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:22150

Show key headers only | View raw


On Sunday, March 25, 2012 4:04:55 PM UTC-6, Heiko Wundram wrote:
> Am 25.03.2012 23:32, schrieb jeff:
> > After the os.setgroups, os.getgroups says that the process is not in
> > any groups, just as you would expect... I can suppress
> > membership in the root group only by doing os.setgid and os.setuid
> > before the os.system call (in which case I wind up in the group of 
> > the
> > new user instead of root), but I have to be able to get back to root
> > privilege so I can't use setgid and setuid.
> 
> Simply not possible (i.e., you can't drop root privileges, be it by 
> setuid()/setgid() or removing yourself from groups with setgroups()), 
> and later reacquire them _in the same process_. See the discussion of 
> how to implement privilege separation at
> 
> http://www.citi.umich.edu/u/provos/ssh/privsep.html
> 
> (which discusses how this is implemented in OpenSSH) by running 
> multiple processes which communicate through IPC mechanisms, and each of 
> those drops the rights it requires. Using IPC to implement 
> reduced-privilege process spawning has a long history; also, Postfix 
> comes to mind as an "early" adopter of a privilege separation mechanism.
> 
> -- 
> --- Heiko.

os.system("su -m <unprivileged_user> -c '<command string>'")

seems to do the trick.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Inconsistency between os.getgroups and os.system('groups') after os.setgroups() jeff <3beezer@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 14:32 -0700
  Re: Inconsistency between os.getgroups and os.system('groups') after os.setgroups() Heiko Wundram <modelnine@modelnine.org> - 2012-03-26 00:04 +0200
    Re: Inconsistency between os.getgroups and os.system('groups') after os.setgroups() jeff <3beezer@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 16:33 -0700
    Re: Inconsistency between os.getgroups and os.system('groups') after os.setgroups() jeff <3beezer@gmail.com> - 2012-03-25 16:33 -0700
      Re: Inconsistency between os.getgroups and os.system('groups') after os.setgroups() Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2012-03-26 11:22 +1100
        Re: Inconsistency between os.getgroups and os.system('groups') after os.setgroups() jeff <3beezer@gmail.com> - 2012-03-26 07:41 -0700

csiph-web