Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #71008
| From | dieter <dieter@handshake.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: xmlrpc: problems with socket handling, close, shutdown of server, TIME_WAIT, ... |
| Date | 2014-05-07 08:43 +0200 |
| References | <01237970-87cd-4d29-a944-09e64b8efeee@googlegroups.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.9725.1399445018.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
thomas.lehmann.private@googlemail.com writes: > ... > taking the xml-rpc derived from standard example is working - basically - but with following scenario I do not understand the problem. Maybe you can help: > > - one Unittest that does create the xmlrpc server in a thread > in "setUp" and shutdown of it in tearDown. > The xml-rcp server does store/load a value for a key. > (It's for testing/learning purpose) > > Problem(s): > > - If I run the test method twice (copy and paste and rename) > then I get a "error: [Errno 98] Address already in use" > (I assumend the tearDown would have closed all sockets) For reliability reasons (their might be (communication) packets under way that may arrive at the wrong partner), a port stays "in use" for twice (I think) the maximal packet lifetime after its "shutdown". This is a TCP (not a Python) property. There is a TCP(socket) option to supress this. For the details, consult the TCP specification.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
xmlrpc: problems with socket handling, close, shutdown of server, TIME_WAIT, ... thomas.lehmann.private@googlemail.com - 2014-05-06 09:07 -0700 Re: xmlrpc: problems with socket handling, close, shutdown of server, TIME_WAIT, ... dieter <dieter@handshake.de> - 2014-05-07 08:43 +0200
csiph-web