Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #70900
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Why has __new__ been implemented as a static method? |
| Date | 2014-05-03 16:32 -0400 |
| References | <lk2gt6$72f$1@ger.gmane.org> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.9668.1399149214.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 5/3/2014 6:37 AM, Jurko Gospodnetić wrote: > Hi all. > > I was wandering why Python implements its __new__ method as a static > and not a class method? For a technical internal reason that Guido and maybe others have explained on pydev (more than once). I forget the details partly because I do not care beyond knowing that there is a reason. You might be able to find something by searching the pydev archives at gmane.org for '__new__ static method'. In other words, Guido knows that it 'should' be a class method, if it could be. > Normally, I'd chalk this issue up under 'bike-shedding', but it came > up while teaching others about Python and so does not feel right leaving > it as 'because that's the way it is'. :-) 'Because that is how it has to be for technical internal reasons beyond the scope of my teaching.' -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: Why has __new__ been implemented as a static method? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-05-03 16:32 -0400
csiph-web