Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #37519

Re: Arent these snippets equivalent?

Show key headers only | View raw

On 01/23/13 16:47, Roy Smith wrote:
> while getchar() as c:
>     putchar(c)
>
> That would give people (including me) the use case they're after most of
> the time (call a function, assign the return value, and test it).  It's
> way less klunky than:
>
> while True:
>     c = getchar()
>     if c:
# I presume you mean "if not c:" here.
>        break
>     putchar()

I was a pretty strong advocate early in one of these long threads, 
and for the simple cases, it's some attractive syntactic sugar. 
However, I found that it quickly blossomed into a lot of really ugly 
edge cases (multiple tests, multiple results, checking for "is None" 
vs. false'ness or some other condition such as "< 0").  I found that 
it was pretty easy to create a generator-wrapper for this:

   def getter(fn):
     while True:
       val = fn()
       if not val: break
       yield val

   # DB example
   cursor = conn.cursor()
   for row in getter(lambda: cursor.fetchmany()):
     do_something(row)

   # your getchar example
   for c in getter(getchar):
     do_something_else(c)

This allowed me to have both the readability and customized tests 
(and the ability to return multiple values).  It could be expanded with

   def getter(fn, is_at_end=lambda v: not v):
     while True:
       val = fn()
       if is_at_end(val): break
       yield val

which would even allow you to do things like

   for line in getter(file("foo.txt"), lambda s: s.find("xxx") < 0):
     print "This line has 'xxx' in it:"
     print line

and those felt a lot more pythonic than any of the proposals I saw 
on the list.

-tkc

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Arent these snippets equivalent? Coolgg <gauravj123@gmail.com> - 2013-01-23 13:56 -0800
  Re: Arent these snippets equivalent? John Gordon <gordon@panix.com> - 2013-01-23 22:06 +0000
  Re: Arent these snippets equivalent? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-24 09:13 +1100
    Re: Arent these snippets equivalent? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-01-23 17:47 -0500
      Re: Arent these snippets equivalent? Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2013-01-23 17:29 -0600
      Re: Arent these snippets equivalent? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-01-24 10:29 +1100
      Re: Arent these snippets equivalent? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2013-01-23 21:38 -0500
        Re: Arent these snippets equivalent? Coolgg <gauravj123@gmail.com> - 2013-01-23 21:01 -0800
        Re: Arent these snippets equivalent? Coolgg <gauravj123@gmail.com> - 2013-01-23 21:01 -0800
  Re: Arent these snippets equivalent? Evan Driscoll <driscoll@cs.wisc.edu> - 2013-01-23 17:17 -0600

csiph-web