Re: Parameterized functions of no arguments?

Path	csiph.com!eeepc.pasdenom.info!news.pasdenom.info!news.dougwise.org!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!news2.euro.net!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path	<python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To	python-list@python.org
Delivered-To	python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status	OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence	'H': 1.00; 'S': 0.00; 'lambda:': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229.12': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'received:lo.gmane.org': 0.09; 'processing.': 0.13; 'skip:m 30': 0.15; 'command': 0.15; 'bieber': 0.16; 'declaimed': 0.16; 'email addr:ix.netcom.com': 0.16; 'email name:wlfraed': 0.16; 'from:addr:ix.netcom.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:wlfraed': 0.16; 'from:name:dennis lee bieber': 0.16; 'lambda': 0.16; 'received:66.245': 0.16; 'received:dsl.mindspring.com': 0.16; 'received:mindspring.com': 0.16; 'received:wlfraed': 0.16; 'sure,': 0.16; 'url:netcom': 0.16; 'url:wlfraed': 0.16; 'wulfraed': 0.16; 'feb': 0.16; 'lee': 0.28; "i'm": 0.28; 'subject:?': 0.29; 'syntax,': 0.30; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.31; '...': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.31; 'url:home': 0.31; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.32; 'does': 0.33; 'received:org': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'charset:us-ascii': 0.37; 'subject:skip:P 10': 0.37; 'effect': 0.38; 'subject:: ': 0.39; 'header:Mime-Version:1': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'dennis': 0.67
X-Injected-Via-Gmane	http://gmane.org/
To	python-list@python.org
From	Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com>
Subject	Re: Parameterized functions of no arguments?
Date	Thu, 10 Feb 2011 23:22:08 -0800
Organization	> Bestiaria Support Staff <
References	<ij2fdr$uo7$1@news.eternal-september.org>
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding	7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host	user-11fa6nq.dsl.mindspring.com
X-Newsreader	Forte Agent 3.3/32.846
X-No-Archive	YES
X-BeenThere	python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version	2.1.12
Precedence	list
List-Id	General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive	<http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post	<mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help	<mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe	<http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.93.1297408937.1633.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines	19
NNTP-Posting-Host	82.94.164.166
X-Trace	1297408937 news.xs4all.nl 81478 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:37988
X-Complaints-To	abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.python:55728

Show key headers only | View raw

On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 04:54:11 +0000, Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk>
declaimed the following in gmane.comp.python.general:

>          menu.add_command(label = str(k), command = lambda: f(k))
>

	I'm not sure, but what effect does

		menu.add_command(label=str(k), command = lambda k=k: f(k))

have on the processing.

	Confusing syntax, I know... does it make more sense as 
			... lambda x=k: f(x)...

-- 
	Wulfraed                 Dennis Lee Bieber         AF6VN
        wlfraed@ix.netcom.com    HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/

Thread

Parameterized functions of no arguments? Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2011-02-11 04:54 +0000
  Re: Parameterized functions of no arguments? Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic@xemacs.org> - 2011-02-11 15:43 +0100
  Re: Parameterized functions of no arguments? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2011-02-10 23:22 -0800
  Re: Parameterized functions of no arguments? Carl Banks <pavlovevidence@gmail.com> - 2011-02-11 05:59 +0000
  Re: Parameterized functions of no arguments? Chris Rebert <clp2@rebertia.com> - 2011-02-10 21:50 -0800
  Re: Parameterized functions of no arguments? Rotwang <sg552@hotmail.co.uk> - 2011-02-11 05:26 +0000

csiph-web