Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #103836
| From | Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Sending an email with a binary attachment |
| Date | 2016-03-01 22:29 -0600 |
| Message-ID | <mailman.91.1456892958.20602.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| References | <mailman.0.1456733421.20602.python-list@python.org> <djjc8gFl1hoU1@mid.individual.net> <CAPTjJmq-Qj9UEg0MNfAWo0CivMcO449=gSA913p4=sN+dp9V8A@mail.gmail.com> <56D54B99.2020206@cajuntechie.org> <CAPTjJmp473VXUERM63KghTw4w4BN3L_gSRWuRUHrzWbERdVZow@mail.gmail.com> |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 03/01/2016 02:03 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Anthony Papillion > <anthony@cajuntechie.org> wrote: >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 >> >> On 02/29/2016 11:13 AM, Chris Angelico wrote: >>> On Tue, Mar 1, 2016 at 4:08 AM, Peter Pearson >>> <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> wrote: >>>> try: smtp.sendmail(message['From'], message['To'], >>>> message.as_string()) except: print "Message sending has >>>> failed" sys.exit(1) print "Message sending was successful" >>>> sys.exit(0) >>>> >>> >>> This is the problem, right here. Replace this code with: >>> >>> smtp.sendmail(message['From'], message['To'], >>> message.as_string()) >> >> Hmm, I'm a bit confused. Are you saying that the problem is that >> I'm enclosing the code in a Try/Except block? Besides that, I >> don't see anything different. If it's the Try/Except block, how >> do I catch the exception it might generate if I'm not using the >> exception block? >> > > That's exactly the difference. Why do you need to catch the > exception? All you're doing is destroying all the information, > rendering it down to a blunt "has failed". Mostly, I catch exceptions for two reasons: 1) because it's a habit that I've developed over the years and 2) I think unhandled exceptions make things look ugly. Mostly, I catch them from habit though. <snip> > > You should catch exceptions if you can actually handle them, but > if all you're doing is printing out a fixed message and aborting, > delete that code. Less code AND a better result. You make some very good points. It's going to take me some time to not catch exceptions by knee-jerk but I can see how doing so can cripple code and make debugging much harder. Thanks for the pointers. Anthony -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIcBAEBCgAGBQJW1mwTAAoJEAKK33RTsEsV0L4P/jvRCX7w+8iqzlFub0CS35C6 KtuFXLEh+evKGhBecgToCA9eutuvCltknCxJz/Yyd56+QFsze1HHdDWGakuOP/1x gOwzZKr1vsjD4eMkoRRokIVkg437yOju0OReUOATKpYGgwnB6xW9RbOLwHRftXfa pmxg5k2KCBZ1omVLQ1BQcvM48Vi5J4k6IlFAVyM/L3Dzsyj9E1CtJ/VarTwkmAOf RbrBV7EH/k1ELM6yWsm0P00zhQkwZTdKt+Y3OGj7WaYoZXk7D3Q8wJqOJrHgInCr /JjbjX8yHtcVVaIRPKGVGt5PGNDdGvkmI5mJPXL+Io0k8faA4QLqjdCTFniyJ2t3 6HprovGQOJs64WN9RshcCwncJcWLC1wcLWZhZOj9nNZawTM6pWEDFpn1zmg6/lqu DmqhEeudjUtCjRJZr9xey47JJRRkjUrh/g1+VRW+aUfeuIc7xA6Nw7qvf3PqT6tH 8CtVwK9O2sHQ4y8lzAK3vCYY3Lw34qdO2zBC0ycxhMPbk1BqcL5U4WOTDZD/9H3h sh0E19pLYsAtoJpF2tnB2PcJaIWA9Zofz5/K6+5fs5B1wVW34Nu8wz6LMhUR1qSW yJH9Wv8Oznk99qiYUiOiduqGKwLM4+Fg0xYAX1muGNRvLfcYuGDFkyYhdZn9f7dM QdmK/dIaGT9l45hjDQTu =RlhP -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Sending an email with a binary attachment Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> - 2016-02-29 02:10 -0600
Re: Sending an email with a binary attachment Peter Pearson <pkpearson@nowhere.invalid> - 2016-02-29 17:08 +0000
Re: Sending an email with a binary attachment Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 04:13 +1100
Re: Sending an email with a binary attachment Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2016-02-29 18:22 +0000
Re: Sending an email with a binary attachment Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2016-02-29 20:43 -0500
Re: Sending an email with a binary attachment Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> - 2016-03-01 01:58 -0600
Re: Sending an email with a binary attachment Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-03-01 19:03 +1100
Re: Sending an email with a binary attachment Anthony Papillion <anthony@cajuntechie.org> - 2016-03-01 22:29 -0600
csiph-web