Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #29460
| From | Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: User defined lexical scoping... can I do this? |
| Date | 2012-09-18 21:38 -0400 |
| References | <d9aec95e-aedb-442d-ab6d-320f43f61b93@googlegroups.com> <f366b2f6-781a-4d66-9386-6be75f631ee3@googlegroups.com> <5058ECD1.1050801@jollybox.de> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.898.1348018725.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On 9/18/2012 5:51 PM, Thomas Jollans wrote: > On 09/18/2012 10:50 PM, weissman.mark@gmail.com wrote: >> Well there's wired stuff like this: >> >> In [1]: locals()["x"] = 5 >> >> In [2]: print x >> 5 >> > > No, there isn't. Modifying the dictionary returned by locals() has no > effect. Last time I tried it, it does within a class -- in cpython at least. That locals dict usually becomes the __dict__ of the class. But not to be depended on indefinitely and across implmentations. -- Terry Jan Reedy
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
User defined lexical scoping... can I do this? porkfried <weissman.mark@gmail.com> - 2012-09-18 13:10 -0700
Re: User defined lexical scoping... can I do this? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-09-18 22:31 +0200
Re: User defined lexical scoping... can I do this? weissman.mark@gmail.com - 2012-09-18 13:50 -0700
Re: User defined lexical scoping... can I do this? Thomas Jollans <t@jollybox.de> - 2012-09-18 23:51 +0200
Re: User defined lexical scoping... can I do this? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-09-18 21:38 -0400
Re: User defined lexical scoping... can I do this? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-19 04:03 +0000
Re: User defined lexical scoping... can I do this? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-19 00:47 +0100
csiph-web