Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #29442

Re: Decorators not worth the effort

From Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de>
Subject Re: Decorators not worth the effort
Date 2012-09-18 19:22 +0200
References <5B80DD153D7D744689F57F4FB69AF4741667C22E@SCACMX008.exchad.jpmchase.net> <246757766.1607257.1347891643781.JavaMail.root@sequans.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.885.1347988968.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


Jean-Michel Pichavant <jeanmichel@sequans.com> writes:

> ----- Original Message -----
>> Jean-Michel Pichavant wrote:
> [snip]
>> One minor note, the style of decorator you are using loses the
>> docstring
>> (at least) of the original function. I would add the
>> @functools.wraps(func)
>> decorator inside your decorator.
>
> Is there a way to not loose the function signature as well ?

Look at the "decorator" module.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Decorators not worth the effort Dieter Maurer <dieter@handshake.de> - 2012-09-18 19:22 +0200

csiph-web