Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #22009
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.005 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'subject:Python': 0.05; 'python': 0.08; 'machines.': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'subject:modules': 0.09; 'from:addr:behnel.de': 0.16; 'from:addr:stefan_ml': 0.16; 'from:name:stefan behnel': 0.16; 'received:188.174': 0.16; 'received:mnet-online.de': 0.16; 'subject: \n ': 0.16; 'subject:which': 0.16; 'subject:Windows': 0.17; 'shipped': 0.18; 'memory': 0.21; "doesn't": 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'stefan': 0.24; 'writes:': 0.25; 'windows': 0.26; 'bit': 0.28; "i'm": 0.28; 'compile': 0.29; 'installing': 0.29; 'cases.': 0.30; 'i/o': 0.30; 'tool.': 0.30; 'installation': 0.30; 'pretty': 0.31; 'subject:?': 0.31; 'version': 0.32; 'certainly': 0.32; "won't": 0.33; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.33; 'file': 0.34; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.34; 'running': 0.34; 'operations': 0.35; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'but': 0.37; 'using': 0.37; 'mass': 0.38; 'data': 0.38; 'processing': 0.39; 'received:de': 0.39; 'subject: (': 0.40; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'our': 0.63; 'limit': 0.67; 'received:188': 0.68; 'serious': 0.78; 'advantages': 0.80; 'bach,': 0.84; 'gcc?': 0.84; 'induces': 0.84 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> |
| Subject | Re: Compiling Python (modules) on 64bit Windows - which compiler suite? |
| Date | Thu, 22 Mar 2012 08:06:17 +0100 |
| References | <808abad4-3ab3-4336-8a31-2f88eb28be01@v22g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <874nthu68q.fsf@jubold.box> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | ppp-188-174-40-245.dynamic.mnet-online.de |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:11.0) Gecko/20120310 Thunderbird/11.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <874nthu68q.fsf@jubold.box> |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.12 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.878.1332399996.3037.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 19 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1332399996 news.xs4all.nl 6977 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44917 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:22009 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Thomas Bach, 21.03.2012 20:03: > Ralph Heinkel writes: >> when processing our mass spectrometry data we are running against the >> 2GB memory limit on our 32 bit machines. So we are planning to move to >> 64bit. Downloading and installing the 64bit version of Python for >> Windows is trivial, but how do we compile our own C extension? > > What about installing Cygwin and using the shipped GCC? I'm pretty sure it doesn't cross compile to native Windows. It certainly won't build against a native Windows Python installation, and given the overhead that cygwin induces into a lot of common OS operations (such as fork(), I/O operations or file system access), a native Windows Python installation has serious advantages in most cases. If the choice is GCC, then MinGW is the right tool. Stefan
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Compiling Python (modules) on 64bit Windows - which compiler suite? Ralph Heinkel <ralph.heinkel@web.de> - 2012-03-21 08:06 -0700
Re: Compiling Python (modules) on 64bit Windows - which compiler suite? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2012-03-21 13:56 -0400
Re: Compiling Python (modules) on 64bit Windows - which compiler suite? Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2012-03-21 15:02 -0400
Re: Compiling Python (modules) on 64bit Windows - which compiler suite? Thomas Bach <thbach@students.uni-mainz.de> - 2012-03-21 20:03 +0100
Re: Compiling Python (modules) on 64bit Windows - which compiler suite? cjgohlke@gmail.com - 2012-03-21 17:06 -0700
Re: Compiling Python (modules) on 64bit Windows - which compiler suite? Ralph Heinkel <ralph.heinkel@web.de> - 2012-03-22 11:34 -0700
Re: Compiling Python (modules) on 64bit Windows - which compiler suite? Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2012-03-22 08:06 +0100
csiph-web