Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #86985

Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct?

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed4a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python-python-list@m.gmane.org>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'algorithm': 0.04; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.04; 'url:pipermail': 0.05; 'lawrence': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; 'topic:': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'bug': 0.12; 'language.': 0.14; 'agree.': 0.16; 'behavior,': 0.16; 'discusses': 0.16; 'nan': 0.16; 'nick': 0.16; 'python-dev,': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'sorting': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'code,': 0.22; 'header:User- Agent:1': 0.23; 'compare': 0.26; 'post': 0.26; 'header:X -Complaints-To:1': 0.27; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'probably': 0.32; 'quite': 0.32; 'url:python': 0.33; 'ago': 0.33; 'entirely': 0.33; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'clear': 0.37; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'extremely': 0.39; 'reported': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'received:org': 0.40; 'major': 0.40; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'days': 0.60; 'our': 0.64; 'charset:windows-1252': 0.65; 'mar': 0.68; 'url:python-dev': 0.84; 'serious': 0.97
X-Injected-Via-Gmane http://gmane.org/
To python-list@python.org
From Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk>
Subject Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct?
Date Fri, 06 Mar 2015 04:46:01 +0000
References <mailman.67.1425594415.21433.python-list@python.org> <54f90c53$0$12994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <858ufazvff.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <54F91C70.6020303@stoneleaf.us> <85wq2uyffs.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <CAPTjJmpnWjGOgeNHXY17knCPKeTYdVxuZVWGqZdeHuMd+2SHBA@mail.gmail.com> <1425616626.2734684.236278461.1D91F36F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host host-92-24-211-56.ppp.as43234.net
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
In-Reply-To <1425616626.2734684.236278461.1D91F36F@webmail.messagingengine.com>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.19
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.87.1425617174.21433.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 22
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1425617174 news.xs4all.nl 2830 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:44616
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:86985

Show key headers only | View raw

On 06/03/2015 04:37, random832@fastmail.us wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2015, at 22:49, Chris Angelico wrote:
>> I'm not sure it's just an optimization. Compare this post from
>> python-dev, where Nick Coghlan discusses the same topic:
>>
>> https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-July/135476.html
>
> If it is a bug for NaN to "infect" containers' behavior, we need to take
> a serious look at sort().
>

I entirely agree.  With the extremely serious bug that was reported (and 
fixed) just a few days ago in the Python sorting algorithm and/or code, 
it is quite clear to me that it probably needs a major rethink.  After 
you :)

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Is nan in (nan,) correct? random832@fastmail.us - 2015-03-05 17:26 -0500
  Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-03-05 15:11 -0800
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-03-06 10:20 +1100
      Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-03-05 15:27 -0800
        Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-03-06 10:39 +1100
        Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 10:40 +1100
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 10:25 +1100
  Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-06 13:09 +1100
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-03-06 13:55 +1100
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-03-05 19:18 -0800
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-03-06 14:26 +1100
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-03-05 19:44 -0800
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 14:49 +1100
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? random832@fastmail.us - 2015-03-05 23:37 -0500
      Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-07 04:07 +1100
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-06 04:46 +0000
  Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 01:50 -0800
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 21:01 +1100
      Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 02:22 -0800
        Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-07 03:59 +1100
          Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 10:04 -0800
            Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-03-06 10:16 -0800
      Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-03-06 15:34 +0000
    Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-07 03:43 +1100
      Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 09:04 -0800
        Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-07 04:16 +1100
          Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 09:36 -0800
        Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-07 10:33 +1100
          Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 18:37 -0800

csiph-web