Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #69186
| Path | csiph.com!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder3.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.hal-mli.net!feeder1.hal-mli.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed3.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.114 |
| X-Spam-Level | * |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.77; '*S*': 0.00; 'matches': 0.07; 'string': 0.09; 'suggest': 0.14; 'from:addr:pobox.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:skip': 0.16; 'negative,': 0.16; 'str()': 0.16; 'suggested,': 0.16; 'sender:addr:gmail.com': 0.17; 'skip': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; 'patch': 0.29; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; 'cases': 0.33; 'moment': 0.34; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'common': 0.35; 'objects': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'are,': 0.36; 'leads': 0.36; 'two': 0.37; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'negative': 0.60; 'free': 0.61; 'took': 0.61; 'results': 0.69; '(5)': 0.74; 'unusual': 0.74; 'day': 0.76; 'behavior': 0.77; 'examples.': 0.84; 'skip:] 20': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type; bh=Fm8UzO9L6I2roOky4xeoRFBsx7lnfLoXbL2nnPxMwg4=; b=GQsGQzCeu2uSJ1YrewghL1/7/MKq5niBkDHI8EUdMxIEBB7S4C103ksAozhaeT7RRk vBJw79PpLFe+EY/ykg4hrcXDRM8IoIjHvjM2cxXdVri9IzwY1LhHJh/GAImjK4TIHcBN o3GylIkHuccY4sD7ECun8WdoPhc0AYp6Jh6ZDiniLJvYEsCbxyOBbEqwCk7Njj3Rn/9Y FXiryU7TPCGjhP3jREX3bip8T6quJMffchcZ1X6e3Ydl8vme8qzDd71zxAM2xx5QdQW0 GGyLE98G18kqB0xXlXms5USEXnBJGNTKDJvLsd1D5rTSHkoUyF3hyvPa8kmUrXmFA/z3 Vaqg== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Received | by 10.50.79.194 with SMTP id l2mr30570084igx.8.1395921394350; Thu, 27 Mar 2014 04:56:34 -0700 (PDT) |
| Sender | skip.montanaro@gmail.com |
| In-Reply-To | <CAPTjJmqbD_QYU4P5eQLmdnHcHFzr2w0HfF6JuEuRgMbU2oWx=g@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <roy-142548.20582725032014@news.panix.com> <mailman.8593.1395876355.18130.python-list@python.org> <53336df8$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <lh0u51$dj8$1@news.albasani.net> <mailman.8613.1395917059.18130.python-list@python.org> <lh11s1$kj3$1@news.albasani.net> <CAPTjJmqbD_QYU4P5eQLmdnHcHFzr2w0HfF6JuEuRgMbU2oWx=g@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | Thu, 27 Mar 2014 06:56:34 -0500 |
| X-Google-Sender-Auth | UTANZcRBKLU86kh9Bt6-p3Sy07I |
| Subject | Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) |
| From | Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> |
| To | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8616.1395921402.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 23 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1395921402 news.xs4all.nl 2919 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:35084 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:69186 |
Show key headers only | View raw
I took a moment to scan the datetime documentation. The behavior of str() on timedelta objects is very consistent, and matches the internal representation. From the docs: str(t) Returns a string in the form [D day[s], ][H]H:MM:SS[.UUUUUU], where D is negative for negative t. (5) Note (5) reads: String representations of timedelta objects are normalized similarly to their internal representation. This leads to somewhat unusual results for negative timedeltas. Feel free to submit a patch to improve str(t), where t is negative, though as Chris suggested, hashing this out on python-ideas would be a good idea. I suggest you start with some concrete examples. There are, as I see it, two common cases where t is negative: -1 day < t < 0 and t <= -1 day Skip
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-25 20:58 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-03-25 18:19 -0700
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-03-26 09:27 +0000
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-03-26 08:37 -0500
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-26 08:04 -0700
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-03-26 10:39 -0500
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-26 17:58 +0200
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-03-26 11:34 -0500
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-26 19:13 +0200
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2014-03-26 19:12 +0000
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-03-27 07:06 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-26 11:50 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2014-03-26 15:02 +0100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-26 16:43 +0200
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-27 01:12 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2014-03-27 11:08 +1300
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2014-03-26 19:25 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-27 00:16 +0000
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-27 12:28 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-26 21:38 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-03-27 08:40 +0000
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Dan Sommers <dan@tombstonezero.net> - 2014-03-27 03:56 +0000
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2014-03-27 11:22 +0100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-27 21:44 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2014-03-27 12:05 +0100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-27 22:33 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@gmx.de> - 2014-03-27 12:25 +0100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-27 22:42 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-03-27 06:56 -0500
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-27 16:04 +0200
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-27 23:20 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-03-27 08:01 -0500
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-03-27 17:10 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-03-27 17:04 -0700
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-03-27 21:46 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-27 21:59 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-03-27 22:24 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-28 14:03 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-27 08:52 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon@rece.vub.ac.be> - 2014-03-27 15:12 +0100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-28 01:15 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-27 23:41 +0000
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-27 20:29 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2014-03-28 11:43 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-28 11:11 +0000
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-28 08:30 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-28 15:10 +0200
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-29 00:19 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-28 09:22 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-28 06:30 -0700
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-29 00:32 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-28 09:20 -0400
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-28 16:34 +0200
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-28 14:35 +0000
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-29 02:25 +1100
Re: YADTR (Yet Another DateTime Rant) Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2014-03-26 16:33 -0700
csiph-web