Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #86984
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1a.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <random832@fastmail.us> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.005 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.99; '*S*': 0.00; 'url:pipermail': 0.05; 'received:internal': 0.09; 'topic:': 0.09; 'bug': 0.12; 'behavior,': 0.16; 'discusses': 0.16; 'message- id:@webmail.messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'nan': 0.16; 'nick': 0.16; 'python-dev,': 0.16; 'received:10.202': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2': 0.16; 'received:10.202.2.212': 0.16; 'received:66.111': 0.16; 'received:66.111.4': 0.16; 'received:messagingengine.com': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'thu,': 0.19; 'compare': 0.26; 'post': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'chris': 0.29; "i'm": 0.30; 'url:python': 0.33; 'received:66': 0.35; 'subject: (': 0.35; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'received:10': 0.37; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'url:mail': 0.40; 'from:no real name:2**0': 0.61; 'header:Message- Id:1': 0.63; 'mar': 0.68; 'url:python-dev': 0.84; 'serious': 0.97 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=fastmail.us; h= message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to:mime-version :content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to:references :subject:date; s=mesmtp; bh=rJmY6gyAbgQKSf5hBkg0c9q7u3A=; b=MmM3 Mn0KTXk54cZRDUzndYiNiHNwef6CnddE+l78U8llOoJEccAcH20pMd/8gN2Tu7/B MbwUswg9LF2ufA3Byjv/4jPhFAJwCFxkNGiNcgPs7zeWTBxuk+kSdE4/ZsVto0sr u79TzN4JqPGJ30LBa+KYzOY4+hlueZk4rso8VkU= |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=message-id:x-sasl-enc:from:to :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding:content-type:in-reply-to :references:subject:date; s=smtpout; bh=rJmY6gyAbgQKSf5hBkg0c9q7 u3A=; b=BsyGh0fuN4tC6OFJDeHjoU7qS5/xulFDG9D3tZVoQyCTB7Ul/L1wu2Io J2Ro41yXIhRmM7kGppHlscRZrqnjQLN3PrbDzYVln3w1viT2h7c5MvLPOpRVPDXf x2V1kwo4hf/LZ/eveV3miy6h6IljoI8eAs25RvmwET/tmx9I6pM= |
| X-Sasl-Enc | af2zstcKEg1l3HLmgp0/M5QMh8v2EDf5WD1QzT8SCqnT 1425616626 |
| From | random832@fastmail.us |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Content-Type | text/plain |
| X-Mailer | MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface - ajax-07699171 |
| In-Reply-To | <CAPTjJmpnWjGOgeNHXY17knCPKeTYdVxuZVWGqZdeHuMd+2SHBA@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <mailman.67.1425594415.21433.python-list@python.org> <54f90c53$0$12994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <858ufazvff.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <54F91C70.6020303@stoneleaf.us> <85wq2uyffs.fsf@benfinney.id.au> <CAPTjJmpnWjGOgeNHXY17knCPKeTYdVxuZVWGqZdeHuMd+2SHBA@mail.gmail.com> |
| Subject | Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? |
| Date | Thu, 05 Mar 2015 23:37:06 -0500 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.19 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.86.1425616629.21433.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 8 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1425616629 news.xs4all.nl 2846 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41866 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:86984 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Thu, Mar 5, 2015, at 22:49, Chris Angelico wrote: > I'm not sure it's just an optimization. Compare this post from > python-dev, where Nick Coghlan discusses the same topic: > > https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2014-July/135476.html If it is a bug for NaN to "infect" containers' behavior, we need to take a serious look at sort().
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is nan in (nan,) correct? random832@fastmail.us - 2015-03-05 17:26 -0500
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-03-05 15:11 -0800
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-03-06 10:20 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? sohcahtoa82@gmail.com - 2015-03-05 15:27 -0800
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-03-06 10:39 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 10:40 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 10:25 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-06 13:09 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-03-06 13:55 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-03-05 19:18 -0800
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2015-03-06 14:26 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-03-05 19:44 -0800
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 14:49 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? random832@fastmail.us - 2015-03-05 23:37 -0500
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-07 04:07 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-03-06 04:46 +0000
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 01:50 -0800
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 21:01 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 02:22 -0800
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-07 03:59 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 10:04 -0800
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2015-03-06 10:16 -0800
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2015-03-06 15:34 +0000
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-07 03:43 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 09:04 -0800
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-03-07 04:16 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 09:36 -0800
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2015-03-07 10:33 +1100
Re: Is nan in (nan,) correct? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2015-03-06 18:37 -0800
csiph-web