Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #4066

Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension

Path csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!feeder.news-service.com!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed5.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <airween@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'skip:p 40': 0.04; 'void': 0.04; 'arguments': 0.05; 'parser': 0.05; 'string,': 0.05; 'args': 0.07; 'raises': 0.07; 'type,': 0.07; 'python': 0.07; ':-)': 0.07; '(there': 0.09; 'arg,': 0.09; 'args,': 0.09; 'arguments,': 0.09; 'exception.': 0.09; 'null);': 0.09; 'null,': 0.09; 'of)': 0.09; 'question:': 0.09; 'this).': 0.09; 'exception': 0.12; 'binary': 0.14; 'defined': 0.15; '"can\'t': 0.16; '"error",': 0.16; '(needed': 0.16; '-1:': 0.16; '>because': 0.16; '>how': 0.16; 'constructs': 0.16; 'parsed': 0.16; 'pyobject': 0.16; 'simple:': 0.16; 'subject:() ': 0.16; 'tuple,': 0.16; 'wanted.': 0.16; 'argument': 0.16; 'static': 0.16; 'input': 0.18; 'have,': 0.20; 'cc:no real name:2**0': 0.20; 'cc:2**0': 0.20; 'variable': 0.21; 'code': 0.22; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.22; 'e.g.': 0.22; 'right,': 0.22; 'parameters.': 0.23; 'objects': 0.24; 'calling': 0.25; 'used,': 0.25; 'value.': 0.25; 'says': 0.25; '(see': 0.26; 'correct': 0.26; '(in': 0.27; 'object': 0.27; 'function': 0.27; 'thanks': 0.29; 'skip:p 30': 0.29; 'string': 0.29; 'error': 0.29; 'skip:* 20': 0.29; 'probably': 0.30; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.31; 'points': 0.31; 'break;': 0.31; 'clear,': 0.31; 'fails,': 0.31; 'does': 0.31; 'match': 0.31; 'url:docs': 0.33; "isn't": 0.34; 'there': 0.35; 'header:User-Agent:1': 0.35; 'right?': 0.35; 'hello,': 0.36; 'think': 0.36; 'data': 0.37; 'two': 0.37; 'case': 0.37; 'url:python': 0.37; 'useful': 0.37; 'but': 0.38; 'url:org': 0.38; 'so,': 0.38; 'set': 0.39; 'where': 0.39; 'how': 0.39; 'takes': 0.40; 'empty': 0.40; 'would': 0.40; "it's": 0.40; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'might': 0.40; 'give': 0.61; 'order': 0.61; 'here': 0.65; 'want,': 0.72; '_it_': 0.84; 'bang': 0.84; 'knows,': 0.84; 'received:hu': 0.84; 'notices': 0.93
X-Spam-Score -1.31
X-Spam-Level
X-Spam-Status No, score=-1.31 tagged_above=-20 required=4 tests=[AWL=0.059, BAYES_00=-2.599, DNS_FROM_OPENWHOIS=1.13, RDNS_DYNAMIC=0.1]
Date Tue, 26 Apr 2011 20:44:26 +0200
From Hegedüs Ervin <airween@gmail.com>
To Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de>
Subject Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension
References <mailman.830.1303811297.9059.python-list@python.org> <ip6dc5$m7d$1@r03.glglgl.eu> <mailman.839.1303826380.9059.python-list@python.org> <ip6qmr$50j$1@r03.glglgl.eu> <mailman.851.1303838890.9059.python-list@python.org> <ip70b8$3lv$1@r03.glglgl.eu>
MIME-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
In-Reply-To <ip70b8$3lv$1@r03.glglgl.eu>
User-Agent Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc python-list@python.org
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.12
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.858.1303843478.9059.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 89
NNTP-Posting-Host 82.94.164.166
X-Trace 1303843478 news.xs4all.nl 34849 [::ffff:82.94.164.166]:49868
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.python:4066

Show key headers only | View raw


Hello,

> >But, when I don't read input arguments (there isn't
> >PyArg_ParseTuple), there isn't exception.
> >
> >How Python handle the number of arguments?
> 
> From what you tell it: with PyArg_ParseTuple(). (see
> http://docs.python.org/c-api/arg.html for this).
> 
> You give a format string (in your case: "ss", again: better use
> "s#s#" if possible) which is parsed in order to get the (needed
> number of) parameters.
> 
> If you call with () or only one arg, args points to an empty tuple,
> but the parser wants two arguments -> bang.
> 
> If you call with more than two args, the function notices it too:
> the arguments would just be dropped, which is probably not what is
> wanted.
> 
> If you call with two args, but of wrong type, they don't match to
> "s" (=string) -> bang again.
> 
> Only with calling with the correct number AND type of args, the
> function says "ok".
> 
> Why is "s#" better than "s"? Simple: the former gives the string
> length as well. "s" means a 0-terminated string, which might not be
> what you want, especially with binary data (what you have, I
> suppose).
> 
> If you give e.g. "ab\0cd" where "s" is used, you get an exception as
> well, as this string cannot be parsed cmpletely. So better use "s#"
> and get the length as well.

so, if em I right, if PyArg_ParseTuple() fails, _it_ raises
TypeError exception... (?)

I think it's clear, thanks :)
 
> >I just ask this,
> >because I don't set errstring with PyErr_SetString, but I get
> >TypeError - how does Python knows, this error raised?
> 
> There is magic inside... :-)

waov :)

and (maybe) final question: :)

I defined many exceptions:

static PyObject *cibcrypt_error_nokey;
static PyObject *cibcrypt_error_nofile;
static PyObject *cibcrypt_error_badpad;
...

void handle_err(int errcode) {
    switch(errcode) {
        case -1:    PyErr_SetString(cibcrypt_error_nokey, "Can't find key.");
                    break;
...
}
...
    cibcrypt_error_nokey = PyErr_NewException("cibcrypt.error_nokey", NULL, NULL);
...
    PyModule_AddObject(o, "error", cibcrypt_error_nokey);

I am right, here also no need any Py_INCREF()/Py_DECREF() action,
based on this doc:
http://docs.python.org/c-api/arg.html

"Another useful function is PyErr_SetFromErrno(), which only
takes an exception argument and constructs the associated value
by inspection of the global variable errno. The most general
function is PyErr_SetObject(), which takes two object arguments,
the exception and its associated value. You don’t need to
Py_INCREF() the objects passed to any of these function"


so, this part of code is right?


thanks again:


a.
 

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Py_INCREF() incomprehension Ervin Hegedüs <airween@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 11:48 +0200
  Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-04-26 14:23 +0200
  Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-04-26 14:21 +0200
    Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Hegedüs Ervin <airween@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 16:03 +0200
      Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-04-26 18:08 +0200
        Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Hegedüs Ervin <airween@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 19:28 +0200
          Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-04-26 19:45 +0200
            Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Hegedüs Ervin <airween@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 20:44 +0200
              Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-04-27 11:58 +0200
                Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Hegedüs Ervin <airween@gmail.com> - 2011-05-01 22:00 +0200
                Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing@canterbury.ac.nz> - 2011-05-02 10:48 +1200
                Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-05-02 02:59 +0200
                Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Hegedüs, Ervin <airween@gmail.com> - 2011-05-02 08:41 +0200
                Re: Py_INCREF() incomprehension Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml@behnel.de> - 2011-05-02 09:07 +0200

csiph-web