Re: advice on sub-classing multiprocessing.Process and multiprocessing.BaseManager

References	<CA+7ESbr9i6VEO709jPF8ghoPRsUggqBrCEJhoXBn7LK6wYSA+w@mail.gmail.com>
Date	2014-03-25 11:19 +1100
Subject	Re: advice on sub-classing multiprocessing.Process and multiprocessing.BaseManager
From	Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.python
Message-ID	<mailman.8474.1395707125.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

On Tue, Mar 25, 2014 at 7:24 AM, Matt Newville
<newville@cars.uchicago.edu> wrote:
> I'm maintaining a python interface to a C library for a distributed
> control system (EPICS, sort of a SCADA system) that does a large
> amount of relatively light-weight network I/O.   In order to keep many
> connections open and responsive, and to provide a simple interface,
> the python library keeps a global store of connection state.
>
> This works well for single processes and threads, but not so well for
> multiprocessing, where the global state causes trouble.

>From the sound of things, a single process is probably what you want
here. Is there something you can't handle with one process?

ChrisA

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: advice on sub-classing multiprocessing.Process and multiprocessing.BaseManager Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-25 11:19 +1100
  Re: advice on sub-classing multiprocessing.Process and multiprocessing.BaseManager matt.newville@gmail.com - 2014-03-24 20:27 -0700
    Re: advice on sub-classing multiprocessing.Process and multiprocessing.BaseManager Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-25 14:44 +1100
      Re: advice on sub-classing multiprocessing.Process and multiprocessing.BaseManager matt.newville@gmail.com - 2014-03-25 06:34 -0700
        Re: advice on sub-classing multiprocessing.Process and multiprocessing.BaseManager Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-26 01:00 +1100

csiph-web