Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #43915
| References | (9 earlier) <mailman.821.1366378384.3114.python-list@python.org> <roy-C0B59C.11314819042013@news.panix.com> <mailman.824.1366386029.3114.python-list@python.org> <roy-CBFB64.12020019042013@news.panix.com> <51716dd1$0$29977$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> |
|---|---|
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | 2013-04-19 16:38 +0000 |
| Subject | Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.830.1366389947.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> wrote: > On Fri, 19 Apr 2013 12:02:00 -0400, Roy Smith wrote: > >> PS: a great C++ interview question is, "What's the difference between a >> class and a struct?" Amazing how few self-professed C++ experts have no >> clue. > > I'm not a C++ expert, but I am an inquiring mind, and I want to know the > answer! C++ class members are private by default; struct members are public by default. That's the only difference as I recall.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Robert Harper <rwh@cs.cmu.edu> - 2013-04-18 17:14 -0400
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-19 12:00 +0000
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-19 09:07 -0400
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-19 23:33 +1000
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-19 11:31 -0400
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2013-04-20 01:40 +1000
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-19 12:02 -0400
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-19 16:16 +0000
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2013-04-19 12:41 -0400
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages 88888 Dihedral <dihedral88888@googlemail.com> - 2013-04-20 00:50 -0700
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-19 16:38 +0000
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com> - 2013-04-19 19:03 -0400
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-19 19:40 -0400
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-19 16:37 +0000
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2013-04-19 19:37 -0400
Re: [TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2013-04-19 23:47 +0000
csiph-web