Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #99816

Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"?

Path csiph.com!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!not-for-mail
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"?
Date Tue, 1 Dec 2015 14:44:38 -0600
Lines 39
Message-ID <mailman.83.1449002726.14615.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
References <94c2e42e-1e5f-40cf-9259-26035e277bf3@googlegroups.com> <mailman.37.1435191416.3674.python-list@python.org> <b48d4b38-a28a-4408-8271-f79e850f453f@googlegroups.com> <mailman.51.1448940760.14615.python-list@python.org> <n3l050$l7a$4@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
X-Trace news.uni-berlin.de 3keh/t32kJqqjVzO55xZ7QgeHvXjINxOgSBUR7zi6r0A==
Return-Path <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.002
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'mrab': 0.05; 'tries': 0.05; 'assignment': 0.07; '*is*': 0.09; 'called.': 0.09; 'typeerror:': 0.09; 'python': 0.10; 'result.': 0.15; '2.7.3': 0.16; '3],': 0.16; 'attempted.': 0.16; 'bug:': 0.16; 'mutated': 0.16; 'received:io': 0.16; 'received:psf.io': 0.16; 'subject:Could': 0.16; 'tup': 0.16; 'tuple,': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'refers': 0.18; '2015': 0.20; '"",': 0.22; 'trying': 0.22; 'dec': 0.23; '(most': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.27; 'subject:other': 0.29; 'subject:some': 0.29; 'skip:[ 10': 0.31; 'subject:) ': 0.32; 'traceback': 0.33; 'tue,': 0.34; 'file': 0.34; 'list': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'expected': 0.35; 'item': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'list,': 0.36; 'received:209.85': 0.36; 'to:addr :python-list': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.37; 'method': 0.37; 'received:209.85.213': 0.37; 'itself': 0.38; 'no,': 0.38; 'received:209': 0.38; 'does': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.40; 'more': 0.63; 'of:': 0.66; 'denis': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84; 'subject:this': 0.85; 'subject:you': 0.85
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=ofA0O9YgQfoMnPM7ZdH0roMLFGPLCUjEIeDCYspWDgk=; b=kaVL5eqDSFEcdEHKoR5DI7F+uKoup46QUtclu3wREsZGbd3yOspq9RiefYzDCc0mUe xM0kh3b6cc5PZlEzP4BbTTo/qU6UcsAzPc0z1syg5BoWJq0cZf2NK+XTSCVG1We7nvtB Bb5WBEhHvgla0Nl3noX3BESgSy82P1n0hlAxO549/Vk0CERf7mwewo2TmBBV48dbSJct EvgMkpzfSqu0eR5ZsFkxluQoh35mPiqRqXBq1A+mV23+bB6t4VWI/KQdAqE0NvL6AdDL pbh9lfPwYnXb/2i2AgmmtXaiYbVkNEwj4VpSf9KrcYKHXz5YrAAwzauLPZv4+OumZ6ig 5Y2A==
X-Received by 10.50.73.130 with SMTP id l2mr68509igv.93.1449002717904; Tue, 01 Dec 2015 12:45:17 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To <n3l050$l7a$4@dont-email.me>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.20+
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:99816

Show key headers only | View raw


On Tue, Dec 1, 2015 at 2:32 PM, Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 01 Dec 2015 03:32:31 +0000, MRAB wrote:
>
>> In the case of:
>>
>>      tup[1] += [6, 7]
>>
>> what it's trying to do is:
>>
>>      tup[1] = tup[1].__iadd__([6, 7])
>>
>> tup[1] refers to a list, and the __iadd__ method _does_ mutate it, but
>> then Python tries to put the result that the method returns into tup[1].
>> That fails because tup itself is a tuple, which is immutable.
>
> I think I might have found a bug:
>
> $ python
> Python 2.7.3 (default, Jun 22 2015, 19:33:41)
> [GCC 4.6.3] on linux2
> Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>>> tup = [1,2,3],[4,5,6]
>>>> tup
> ([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6])
>>>> tup[1]
> [4, 5, 6]
>>>> tup[1] += [7,8,9]
> Traceback (most recent call last):
>   File "<stdin>", line 1, in <module>
> TypeError: 'tuple' object does not support item assignment
>>>> tup[1]
> [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
>>>> tup
> ([1, 2, 3], [4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9])
>>>> quit()

No, that's the expected result. As MRAB wrote, the list *is* mutated
when its __iadd__ method is called. The TypeError happens afterward
when the assignment is attempted.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"? fl <rxjwg98@gmail.com> - 2015-11-30 18:14 -0800
  Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"? MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2015-12-01 03:32 +0000
    Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 20:32 +0000
      Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 14:44 -0600
        Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 21:37 +0000
          Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"? Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> - 2015-12-01 22:34 +0000
          Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"? Erik <python@lucidity.plus.com> - 2015-12-01 22:44 +0000
      Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-12-01 16:18 -0500
        Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"? Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2015-12-01 21:36 +0000
          Re: Could you explain this rebinding (or some other action) on "nums = nums"? Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2015-12-01 17:37 -0500

csiph-web