Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #68467

Re: 'complex' function with string argument.

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!feeds.news.ox.ac.uk!news.ox.ac.uk!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <skip.montanaro@gmail.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.001
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'operator': 0.03; 'expressions': 0.07; "subject:' ": 0.07; 'variables': 0.07; 'escape': 0.09; 'subject:string': 0.09; 'cc:addr:python-list': 0.11; 'from:addr:pobox.com': 0.16; 'from:addr:skip': 0.16; 'non- ascii': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'reedy': 0.16; 'sender:addr:gmail.com': 0.17; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'work,': 0.20; '>>>': 0.22; 'proposed': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; 'creating': 0.23; 'case.': 0.24; 'skip': 0.24; 'space.': 0.24; 'fine': 0.24; 'mon,': 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply- To:1': 0.27; 'character': 0.29; 'sets': 0.30; 'message- id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'subject:with': 0.35; 'operations': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'pm,': 0.38; 'extremely': 0.39; 'space': 0.40; 'numbers': 0.61; 'worth': 0.66; 'mar': 0.68; 'surround': 0.84
DKIM-Signature v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=1CrVJyziuFAJW7ek43X7oTfhAViHJIZ0b/s2+HRjnS8=; b=KZWMzvme0zM0o6kL8v2nqTveh20Q2HiRhNl+MEhkggYELXi9XBjBaUG9d5xOus5Exi Poz+K9z2yQJXDibaVaE4gbQ+tIDi8Fu08MLJKaonKOGd2a5TIN5AT1ZGqo9/QgpD7s8e 3MslToCoJaJn/sN7t0NJm3j2fZl3w48NIJr0sjCgXTKSUHZUb2lmTYHrEnWt1nH89CGL PBN/elO3CoCDOLVZQk3soJ4MMBSuwV5XQmkBYzyEljdIAoGCO2miqJISwiY+3uOKXDDi 9K508LV3wxMOwDH1LhcFodvclGBmu3ivsNLvEhvPu+1i0eS1NeBkB5ce6Y4nZCdJCxoE 9hLw==
MIME-Version 1.0
X-Received by 10.50.56.109 with SMTP id z13mr15479153igp.6.1395100785465; Mon, 17 Mar 2014 16:59:45 -0700 (PDT)
Sender skip.montanaro@gmail.com
In-Reply-To <lg7rle$4q0$1@ger.gmane.org>
References <8c862bec-815e-424c-81e2-8f37ebab1c35@googlegroups.com> <loom.20140317T184835-830@post.gmane.org> <lg7rle$4q0$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date Mon, 17 Mar 2014 18:59:44 -0500
X-Google-Sender-Auth -Ks3Sz4oPN9BwHbg45fknxPWIcA
Subject Re: 'complex' function with string argument.
From Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com>
To Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu>
Content-Type text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Cc Python <python-list@python.org>
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.8228.1395100788.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 19
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1395100788 news.xs4all.nl 2903 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:41602
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:68467

Show key headers only | View raw

On Mon, Mar 17, 2014 at 5:06 PM, Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> wrote:
> Mathematicians genearally write both without spaces.

Mathematicians also have a tendency to use single letter variables and
often escape into non-ASCII character sets as well. <wink>

Perhaps it's worth pointing out that pylint complains about most/many
infix operations if you don't surround the operator with white space.
And, complex expressions work just fine with white space around the
operator:

>>> 1 + 2j
(1+2j)

Personally, I'm agnostic to the proposed change. I don't use complex
numbers in my work, and I suspect that creating complex numbers from
strings is an extremely small corner case.

Skip

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

'complex' function with string argument. Jayanth Koushik <jnkoushik@gmail.com> - 2014-03-15 09:26 -0700
  Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Mark H Harris <harrismh777@gmail.com> - 2014-03-17 11:18 -0500
    Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-18 04:03 +1100
      Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-17 20:15 +0200
        Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-03-17 12:28 -0600
        Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-18 05:59 +1100
          Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-17 21:22 +0200
            Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-18 06:32 +1100
            Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-18 04:08 +0000
      Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Mark H Harris <harrismh777@gmail.com> - 2014-03-17 13:20 -0500
    Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-18 04:52 +0000
      Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-18 15:59 +1100
      Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Mark H Harris <harrismh777@gmail.com> - 2014-03-18 11:14 -0500
        Re: 'complex' function with string argument. wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-03-19 00:30 -0700
          Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-19 10:51 +0200
            Re: 'complex' function with string argument. wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-03-19 02:52 -0700
              Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-19 12:09 +0200
                Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-03-19 04:33 -0600
                Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-19 12:53 +0200
                Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-03-19 13:35 -0600
                Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-03-19 06:04 -0500
                Re: 'complex' function with string argument. wxjmfauth@gmail.com - 2014-03-19 07:35 -0700
                Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-03-19 12:45 -0600
  Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Mark Dickinson <mdickinson@enthought.com> - 2014-03-17 17:55 +0000
  Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Terry Reedy <tjreedy@udel.edu> - 2014-03-17 18:06 -0400
  Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-03-17 18:59 -0500
  Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-18 11:16 +1100
  Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-03-17 20:07 -0500
  Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-03-18 08:04 +0100
    Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-18 18:11 +1100
    Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-18 08:00 +0000
      Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Christian Gollwitzer <auriocus@gmx.de> - 2014-03-18 09:21 +0100
        Re: 'complex' function with string argument. Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-18 16:00 +0200

csiph-web