Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #68361
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!aioe.org!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <pmawhorter@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.000 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'python,': 0.02; 'syntax': 0.04; 'third-party': 0.04; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'parser': 0.07; 'plenty': 0.07; 'subject:PEP': 0.07; 'though:': 0.07; 'builtin': 0.09; 'e.g.,': 0.09; 'generators': 0.09; 'parsing': 0.09; 'seemed': 0.09; 'subject:GSoC': 0.09; 'subject:module': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; 'mostly': 0.14; 'idea:': 0.16; 'programing': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'relates': 0.16; 'subject:generator': 0.16; 'subject:parser': 0.16; 'task.': 0.16; 'student': 0.16; 'language': 0.16; 'library': 0.18; 'looked': 0.18; 'all,': 0.19; 'bit': 0.19; 'module': 0.19; 'everyone,': 0.19; 'written': 0.21; 'seems': 0.21; 'integrate': 0.24; 'module,': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'developers': 0.25; '(see': 0.26; 'subject:/': 0.26; 'point': 0.28; '[1]': 0.29; "doesn't": 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; 'serve': 0.31; 'towards': 0.31; 'integrating': 0.31; 'libraries': 0.31; 'waters': 0.31; 'probably': 0.32; 'figure': 0.32; 'another': 0.32; 'worked': 0.33; 'community': 0.33; 'problem': 0.35; 'something': 0.35; "who's": 0.35; 'test': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'building': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; 'module.': 0.36; "didn't": 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'should': 0.36; 'so,': 0.37; 'turn': 0.37; 'project': 0.37; 'list.': 0.37; 'feedback': 0.38; 'tasks': 0.38; 'needed': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'issue': 0.38; 'rather': 0.38; 'embedded': 0.39; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'how': 0.40; 'extended': 0.61; 'new': 0.61; 'providing': 0.61; 'first': 0.61; 'kind': 0.63; 'pick': 0.64; 'more': 0.64; 'different': 0.65; 'specialized': 0.65; 'contact': 0.67; 'route': 0.84; "they'd": 0.84; 'imagine': 0.93 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=U6JgDXmPYrziJDZ3FCbEYW9RF3kns2ajf/Z3uoUBhdY=; b=xSsUp58jjfbM5f4dQwN2NxU6aUO4AW4WSfcElX7ZTTnItMPz9spHZwyq4UDJleYUyz pnzHiyT3MLLYE+1vtG3/vxiL/V70vS6eeuVGaL5sorfQje2JPazB+VUtLpTsLDbBPgGf YyNLbsWtEqnpIiU4N1WDNbH8oUP0yaVMPt9dj2waT6cDG7GfFf8Rz31Ngtc2sE6KpwYo Uv5bwGhh4Mwo7N1hrN3ULtzdR5cCghnGN2S5AhQfwTI1vsBFgxWZP6ka8YjvOEyYdH0D jTlrJwciWQ5G7j+ADx27aEV3ZlVaxbXcu+GO1QQekexnXax5aIRScf9dfh1o+8zk0BRC S0lg== |
| X-Received | by 10.58.229.4 with SMTP id sm4mr7798705vec.10.1394823104990; Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:51:44 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| From | Peter Mawhorter <pmawhorter@gmail.com> |
| Date | Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:51:14 -0700 |
| Subject | PEP/GSoC idea: built-in parser generator module for Python? |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-Mailman-Approved-At | Fri, 14 Mar 2014 20:17:53 +0100 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8152.1394824673.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 44 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1394824673 news.xs4all.nl 2903 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:58364 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:68361 |
Show key headers only | View raw
First of all, hi everyone, I'm new to this list. I'm a grad student who's worked on and off with Python on various projects for 8ish years now. I recently wanted to construct a parser for another programing language in Python and was dissapointed that Python doesn't have a built-in module for building parsers, which seems like a common-enough task. There are plenty of different 3rd-party parsing libraries available, specialized in lots of different ways (see e.g., [1]). I happened to pick one that seemed suitable for my needs but didn't turn out to support the recursive structures that I needed to parse. Rather than pick a different one I just built my own parser generator module, and used that to build my parser: problem solved. It would have been much nicer if there were a fully-featured builtin parser generator module in Python, however, and the purpose of this email is to test the waters a bit: is this something that other people in the Python community would be interested in? I imagine the route to providing a built-in parser generator module would be to first canvass the community to figure out what third-party libraries they use, and then contact the developers of some of the top libraries to see if they'd be happy integrating as a built-in module. At that point someone would need to work to integrate the chosen third-party library as a built-in module (ideally with its developers). >From what I've looked at PyParsing and PLY seem to be standout parser generators for Python, PyParsing has a bit more Pythonic syntax from what I've seen. One important issue would be speed though: an implementation mostly written in C for low-level parsing tasks would probably be much preferrable to one written in pure Python, since a builtin module should be geared towards efficiency, but I don't actually know exactly how that would work (I've both extended and embedded Python with/in C before, but I'm not sure how that kind of project relates to writing a built-in module in C). Sorry if this is a bit rambly, but I'm interested in feedback from the community on this idea: is a builtin parser generator module desirable? If so, would integrating PyParsing as a builtin module be a good solution? What 3rd-party parsing module do you think would serve best for this purpose? -Peter Mawhorter [1] http://nedbatchelder.com/text/python-parsers.html
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
PEP/GSoC idea: built-in parser generator module for Python? Peter Mawhorter <pmawhorter@gmail.com> - 2014-03-14 11:51 -0700
csiph-web