Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #68346
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed2.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.016 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.97; '*S*': 0.00; 'cpython': 0.05; 'cc:addr :python-list': 0.11; 'def': 0.12; '(none,': 0.16; '[1].': 0.16; 'api,': 0.16; 'cross.': 0.16; 'from:addr:rosuav': 0.16; 'from:name:chris angelico': 0.16; 'none.': 0.16; 'troll': 0.16; 'url:linux': 0.16; 'exception': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; "python's": 0.19; 'thu,': 0.19; 'value.': 0.19; '>>>': 0.22; 'import': 0.22; 'cc:addr:python.org': 0.22; "haven't": 0.24; 'cc:2**0': 0.24; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; 'function': 0.29; 'chris': 0.29; 'skip:p 30': 0.29; '[1]': 0.29; 'am,': 0.29; 'raise': 0.29; 'unix': 0.29; 'see,': 0.30; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.30; "i'm": 0.30; '13,': 0.31; '>>>>': 0.31; 'slot': 0.31; 'fri,': 0.33; 'moment': 0.34; '(2)': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'received:google.com': 0.35; 'there': 0.35; '14,': 0.36; 'otherwise.': 0.36; 'subject:?': 0.36; 'pm,': 0.38; 'ian': 0.60; 'url:3': 0.61; 'talking': 0.65; 'subject:. ': 0.67; 'mar': 0.68; 'statement,': 0.68; 'const': 0.84; 'fails,': 0.84; 'is!': 0.84; 'to:none': 0.92 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:cc :content-type; bh=Z0T/+BJxXwKbaE+LoIB66XOkCEcaxZJlTz1xIDh8DpU=; b=ZqyV9eS5053BTadBpRT6UETsHiosUtPw8U6TW+vVexBhrnQpqxlv6KkIYRUXuKWhDz 4bA5wO8jLEJwjHGaPx/+FBuwoszwW38qT5LLWNBlm8uPG+y3N9VNKkisogzO06YvC8np mYsK8DPbQuciKygp2f1OXWWZa57C6A8TKHWbayEXHVdNE0dzu1sTMNYNKLkK1xz4XSFn +xgT+n7FYLjXY3998Uxrm8fbUYLjUpqM/bIjkhp44WC1hvmUWfWdAoi5/CyFcfpyIJE9 5AY5Z7wcMFiVh65Rt44uD3v3KKVz2u2oPLwhg0qGaiJzfACXWX42tGkdEW7RYdwoWPkz JTSg== |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| X-Received | by 10.68.171.193 with SMTP id aw1mr5587212pbc.117.1394756564043; Thu, 13 Mar 2014 17:22:44 -0700 (PDT) |
| In-Reply-To | <CALwzidkG1GdOH5PQDEzaj76aNW2OWCMXYkg4_xth38jtnvBJ9g@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <53206e6a$0$2886$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <mailman.8093.1394636439.18130.python-list@python.org> <53207d77$0$2886$e4fe514c@news2.news.xs4all.nl> <5320e8c9$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <roy-493F5F.07442713032014@news.panix.com> <87y50el1vf.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <5322420e$0$29994$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com> <CAPTjJmpufKDDnWRBusutSR4hdxVu8LvmBp9SXjYJmBjy7rx+4Q@mail.gmail.com> <CALwzidkG1GdOH5PQDEzaj76aNW2OWCMXYkg4_xth38jtnvBJ9g@mail.gmail.com> |
| Date | Fri, 14 Mar 2014 11:22:43 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? |
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
| Cc | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8137.1394756567.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 53 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1394756567 news.xs4all.nl 2863 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:32996 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:68346 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Fri, Mar 14, 2014 at 11:08 AM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 5:55 PM, Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I'm going to troll for a moment and give you a function that has no
>> return value.
>>
>> def procedure():
>> raise Exception
>
>>>> import dis
>>>> dis.dis(procedure)
> 2 0 LOAD_GLOBAL 0 (Exception)
> 3 RAISE_VARARGS 1
> 6 LOAD_CONST 0 (None)
> 9 RETURN_VALUE
That's a return value in the same way that exec() has a return value
[1]. If somehow the raise fails, it'll return None.
>>>> def get_procedure_return_value():
> ... """Returns the return value of procedure()."""
> ... return procedure.__code__.co_consts[0]
> ...
>>>> print(get_procedure_return_value())
> None
>
> Look, there it is!
Succeeds by coincidence. From what I can see, *every* CPython function
has const slot 0 dedicated to None. At least, I haven't been able to
do otherwise.
>>> def function(x):
return x*2+1
>>> import dis
>>> dis.dis(function)
2 0 LOAD_FAST 0 (x)
3 LOAD_CONST 1 (2)
6 BINARY_MULTIPLY
7 LOAD_CONST 2 (1)
10 BINARY_ADD
11 RETURN_VALUE
>>> function.__code__.co_consts
(None, 2, 1)
Your return value retriever would say it returns None still, but it doesn't.
Trollbridge: you have to pay a troll to cross.
ChrisA
[1] I'm not talking about Python's 'exec' statement, but about the
Unix exec() API, eg execlpe() - see http://linux.die.net/man/3/exec
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Deep vs. shallow copy? Alex van der Spek <zdoor@xs4all.nl> - 2014-03-12 14:25 +0000
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com> - 2014-03-12 09:48 -0500
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Zachary Ware <zachary.ware+pylist@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 10:00 -0500
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Alex van der Spek <zdoor@xs4all.nl> - 2014-03-12 15:29 +0000
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Wayne Brehaut <wbrehaut@mcsnet.ca> - 2014-03-12 13:06 -0600
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-12 23:07 +0000
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-12 20:09 -0700
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Ian <hobson42@gmail.com> - 2014-03-13 11:38 +0000
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-13 08:28 -0700
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? random832@fastmail.us - 2014-03-13 13:25 -0400
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Roy Smith <roy@panix.com> - 2014-03-13 07:44 -0400
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-13 14:27 +0200
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-13 23:41 +0000
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-14 10:55 +1100
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-14 01:41 +0000
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2014-03-13 18:08 -0600
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-14 11:22 +1100
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-14 01:59 +0000
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Rustom Mody <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2014-03-13 19:57 -0700
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-14 04:43 +0000
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-03-14 06:17 +0000
Re: Deep vs. shallow copy? Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2014-03-13 23:31 +0000
csiph-web