Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #91163
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!news.redatomik.org!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!newsgate.cistron.nl!newsgate.news.xs4all.nl!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.068 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 0.86; '*S*': 0.00; 'classes.': 0.07; 'python': 0.11; '23,': 0.16; 'definition.': 0.16; 'inheritance': 0.16; 'thought.': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.16; 'flexibility': 0.18; 'say,': 0.18; 'runs': 0.18; 'class,': 0.22; 'enforce': 0.22; 'suppose': 0.22; '2015': 0.23; 'module': 0.23; 'sat,': 0.23; 'header:In- Reply-To:1': 0.24; 'written': 0.24; 'message-id:@mail.gmail.com': 0.28; "i'm": 0.29; 'hacker': 0.29; 'parent': 0.29; 'post': 0.32; 'though,': 0.32; 'class': 0.33; 'problem': 0.33; 'usually': 0.33; 'another': 0.34; 'received:google.com': 0.34; 'to:addr:python- list': 0.35; 'really': 0.35; 'but': 0.36; 'list,': 0.36; 'there': 0.36; "let's": 0.36; 'should': 0.37; 'subject:: ': 0.37; "won't": 0.38; 'names': 0.38; 'pm,': 0.39; 'method': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'seem': 0.39; 'subject:-': 0.39; 'why': 0.40; 'some': 0.40; 'john': 0.61; 'design,': 0.61; 'within': 0.64; 'different': 0.64; 'between': 0.65; 'dr.': 0.69; 'behaviors': 0.72; 'unusual': 0.72; 'collision': 0.84; 'to:name:python': 0.84 |
| DKIM-Signature | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=ZCxrxa5R9kBUnky3w2EYXckemKSHkak8KyaPYLJRgYI=; b=GhVBSNkJ4rd0QT2arWGkITehAHUPx4eXsIOebCOziROlvuaiwOmw1eqELRJJakJGUR pt10dCt0KAGnyhhUmlkl7xlXz3JPVGlQKPRQFORa5Ulru+P0w5lYugXXsMdcQ9W/6zC2 POeMr4CR32XnpeT8btFWLF2NZPJ5oC/Ck/MUP/PL8xJZbgAuEqp2PTwP/WpbcAd2FkOH 507iPLWO6eOjfl9opnFFgq/uACPJKr0XXFQJme0eM7vn/cPVXSSdOVfP+ycMJ8t70ysg wX3P5iaAO24NuLLQAfvUxMnkHfcRWphwncqxd0Xn72jJDK2qW+1rgqeg8sp+9nMCEhQE H1fQ== |
| X-Received | by 10.43.65.19 with SMTP id xk19mr18757554icb.20.1432453222022; Sun, 24 May 2015 00:40:22 -0700 (PDT) |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| In-Reply-To | <CADL-DviUKRgpk-hmK6kqYik0D6bWLXveRLjNWqZPAbximmHhSQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| References | <CADL-DviUKRgpk-hmK6kqYik0D6bWLXveRLjNWqZPAbximmHhSQ@mail.gmail.com> |
| From | Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> |
| Date | Sun, 24 May 2015 01:39:41 -0600 |
| Subject | Re: mix-in classes |
| To | Python <python-list@python.org> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8 |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.20+ |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.8.1432453224.5151.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 22 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1432453224 news.xs4all.nl 2880 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45947 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:91163 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 7:53 PM, Dr. John Q. Hacker <zondervanz@gmail.com> wrote: > The post on "different types of inheritence..." brought up a thought. > > Let's say, I'm adding flexibility to a module by letting users change class > behaviors by adding different mix-in classes. > > What should happen when there's a name collision on method names between > mix-ins? Since they're mix-ins, it's not presumed that there is any parent > class to decide. The proper thing would seem to call each method in the > order that they are written within the parent class definition. > > I suppose one can create a method in the parent class, that runs the mixin > methods in the same order as in the inheritance list, but would there be a > better way for Python to enforce such a practice so as not to create class > anarchy? (A problem for another topic.) Usually with mixins, one just wants to call a method of a specific mixin; a name collision is likely a symptom of poor design, and it would be unusual to want to call *all* mixin methods with the same name. If you really want to do that for a particular method though, is there some reason why super() won't suffice?
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: mix-in classes Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2015-05-24 01:39 -0600
csiph-web