Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #68038

Re: Python performance

Path csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!news.swapon.de!news.stack.nl!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed1.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail
Return-Path <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
X-Original-To python-list@python.org
Delivered-To python-list@mail.python.org
X-Spam-Status OK 0.000
X-Spam-Evidence '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'algorithm': 0.04; 'languages.': 0.04; 'python)': 0.05; 'subject:Python': 0.06; 'processing.': 0.07; 'converted': 0.09; 'doing?': 0.09; 'occasionally': 0.09; 'python': 0.11; '-tkc': 0.16; 'bound,': 0.16; 'code?': 0.16; 'folks,': 0.16; 'from:addr:python.list': 0.16; 'from:addr:tim.thechases.com': 0.16; 'from:name:tim chase': 0.16; 'personally,': 0.16; 'python),': 0.16; 'python;': 0.16; 'pythonic': 0.16; 'rarely': 0.16; 'sorts': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.18; 'memory': 0.22; 'issue,': 0.24; 'tend': 0.24; 'java': 0.24; "i've": 0.25; 'switch': 0.26; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.27; "i'm": 0.30; 'code': 0.31; '(usually': 0.31; 'libraries': 0.31; 'checking': 0.33; 'noticed': 0.34; 'could': 0.34; 'problem': 0.35; 'classes': 0.35; 'operations': 0.35; 'but': 0.35; 'charset:us- ascii': 0.36; 'application': 0.37; 'performance': 0.37; '(i.e.,': 0.38; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.38; 'sure': 0.39; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'algorithms': 0.60; 'most': 0.60; 'received:50.22': 0.84; 'trouble.': 0.91
Date Sat, 8 Mar 2014 07:40:48 -0600
From Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com>
To python-list@python.org
Subject Re: Python performance
In-Reply-To <290bb6ed-a17e-45e3-8ff7-e58bb50e66a6@googlegroups.com>
References <290bb6ed-a17e-45e3-8ff7-e58bb50e66a6@googlegroups.com>
X-Mailer Claws Mail 3.8.1 (GTK+ 2.24.10; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-AntiAbuse This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse Primary Hostname - boston.accountservergroup.com
X-AntiAbuse Original Domain - python.org
X-AntiAbuse Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse Sender Address Domain - tim.thechases.com
X-Get-Message-Sender-Via boston.accountservergroup.com: authenticated_id: tim@thechases.com
X-BeenThere python-list@python.org
X-Mailman-Version 2.1.15
Precedence list
List-Id General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org>
List-Unsubscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/>
List-Post <mailto:python-list@python.org>
List-Help <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe <https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.7930.1394286032.18130.python-list@python.org> (permalink)
Lines 33
NNTP-Posting-Host 2001:888:2000:d::a6
X-Trace 1394286032 news.xs4all.nl 2894 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:60034
X-Complaints-To abuse@xs4all.nl
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.python:68038

Show key headers only | View raw


On 2014-03-08 04:53, JCosta wrote:
> I did some work in c# and java and I converted some application to
> Python; I noticed Python is much slower than the other languages.
> 
> Is this normal ?

It depends.

Did you write C#/Java in Python (i.e., use C# or Java idioms in
Python), or did you write Pythonic code?

Check your algorithms and storage classes for performance
characteristics (if you used an O(1) algorithm/container in C#/Java
but used an O(N) algorithm/container in Python) and make sure they
match.

What sorts of operations are you doing?  Are you CPU-bound, I/O
bound, or memory-bound?  Have you profiled to see where the hot-spots
are?

Personally, I've found that most of my code is I/O-bound (disk or
network), and that very rarely has CPU been much of a problem
(usually checking my algorithm if there's trouble; occasionally I'm
stuck with an O(N^2) algorithm and no language-choice.  For some
folks, using one of the specialty-math libraries can speed up numeric
processing.  If I know that memory could be an issue, I tend to switch
to a disk-based data-stores to head off any trouble.

-tkc



Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Python performance JCosta <generalcosta@gmail.com> - 2014-03-08 04:53 -0800
  Re: Python performance Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-03-09 00:24 +1100
  Re: Python performance Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2014-03-08 07:40 -0600
  Re: Python performance Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-03-08 19:48 +0200
  Re: Python performance JCosta <generalcosta@gmail.com> - 2014-03-08 10:30 -0800
    Re: Python performance Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2014-03-08 18:49 +0000
  Re: Python performance Ned Batchelder <ned@nedbatchelder.com> - 2014-03-08 13:56 -0500

csiph-web