Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #29305
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!gegeweb.org!de-l.enfer-du-nord.net!feeder1.enfer-du-nord.net!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!newsfeed.xs4all.nl!newsfeed6.news.xs4all.nl!xs4all!post.news.xs4all.nl!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Return-Path | <python-python-list@m.gmane.org> |
| X-Original-To | python-list@python.org |
| Delivered-To | python-list@mail.python.org |
| X-Spam-Status | OK 0.001 |
| X-Spam-Evidence | '*H*': 1.00; '*S*': 0.00; 'exception': 0.03; 'calls.': 0.07; 'subject:test': 0.07; '0),': 0.09; '[0,': 0.09; 'received:80.91': 0.09; 'received:80.91.229': 0.09; 'received:gmane.org': 0.09; 'received:list': 0.09; '(ie,': 0.16; '-1))': 0.16; '1),': 0.16; 'iterator': 0.16; 'keyerror': 0.16; 'received:80.91.229.3': 0.16; 'received:plane.gmane.org': 0.16; 'repetition': 0.16; 'subject:strategy': 0.16; 'wrote:': 0.17; 'script.': 0.17; 'creates': 0.18; 'are.': 0.22; "i'd": 0.22; "i've": 0.23; 'seems': 0.23; 'header:In-Reply-To:1': 0.25; 'header :User-Agent:1': 0.26; 'accuracy': 0.27; 'thoughts': 0.27; 'developing': 0.28; 'header:X-Complaints-To:1': 0.28; 'rest': 0.28; "people's": 0.29; "i'm": 0.29; "skip:' 10": 0.30; 'function': 0.30; 'point': 0.31; 'url:python': 0.32; 'from:addr:yahoo.co.uk': 0.32; 'could': 0.32; 'avoiding': 0.33; 'to:addr:python-list': 0.33; 'version': 0.34; 'something': 0.35; 'received:org': 0.36; 'created': 0.36; 'but': 0.36; 'url:org': 0.36; 'url:library': 0.36; 'test': 0.36; 'subject:: ': 0.38; 'mark': 0.38; 'url:docs': 0.38; 'to:addr:python.org': 0.39; 'hello,': 0.39; 'header:Received:5': 0.40; 'think': 0.40; 'first': 0.61; 'between': 0.63; 'more': 0.63; 'strategy': 0.64; 'introduce': 0.80 |
| X-Injected-Via-Gmane | http://gmane.org/ |
| To | python-list@python.org |
| From | Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> |
| Subject | Re: unit test strategy |
| Date | Sun, 16 Sep 2012 13:28:17 +0100 |
| References | <e0d36274-3345-4eeb-bc0a-9da283b9778f@googlegroups.com> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host | host-78-147-184-155.as13285.net |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.0; rv:15.0) Gecko/20120907 Thunderbird/15.0.1 |
| In-Reply-To | <e0d36274-3345-4eeb-bc0a-9da283b9778f@googlegroups.com> |
| X-Antivirus | avast! (VPS 120916-0, 16/09/2012), Outbound message |
| X-Antivirus-Status | Clean |
| X-BeenThere | python-list@python.org |
| X-Mailman-Version | 2.1.15 |
| Precedence | list |
| List-Id | General discussion list for the Python programming language <python-list.python.org> |
| List-Unsubscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=unsubscribe> |
| List-Archive | <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/> |
| List-Post | <mailto:python-list@python.org> |
| List-Help | <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=help> |
| List-Subscribe | <http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list>, <mailto:python-list-request@python.org?subject=subscribe> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Message-ID | <mailman.788.1347798515.27098.python-list@python.org> (permalink) |
| Lines | 34 |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 2001:888:2000:d::a6 |
| X-Trace | 1347798515 news.xs4all.nl 6961 [2001:888:2000:d::a6]:45571 |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@xs4all.nl |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.python:29305 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 15/09/2012 03:59, Aaron Brady wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've developing a test script. There's a lot of repetition. I want to introduce a strategy for approaching it, but I don't want the program to be discredited because of the test script. Therefore, I'd like to know what people's reactions to and thoughts about it are.
>
> The first strategy I used created an iterator and advanced it between each step:
> self.op_chain(range(5), ('add', 5))
> self.op_chain(range(5), ('add', -2), ('add', -1))
> self.op_chain(range(5), ('discard', -1), ('add', 5))
> self.op_chain_ok(range(5), ('update', [0, 1]))
> Etc.
>
> I'm considering something more complicated. 'iN' creates iterator N, 'nN' advances iterator N, an exception calls 'assertRaises', and the rest are function calls.
> dsi= dict.__setitem__
> ddi= dict.__delitem__
> dsd= dict.setdefault
> KE= KeyError
> IE= IterationError
> self.chain(range(10), 'i0', (dsi, 0, 1), 'n0', (dsi, 10, 1), (IE, 'n0'))
> self.chain(range(10), 'i0', 'n0', (dsd, 0, 0), 'n0', (dsd, 10, 1), (IE, 'n0'))
> self.chain(range(10), 'i0', (KE, ddi, 10), 'n0', (ddi, 9), (IE, 'n0'))
>
> Do you think the 2nd version is legible? Could it interfere with the accuracy of the test?
>
http://docs.python.org/library/unittest.html#organizing-test-code seems
to be a good starting point for avoiding repetition and introducing a
strategy.
--
Cheers.
Mark Lawrence.
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
unit test strategy Aaron Brady <castironpi@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 19:59 -0700
Re: unit test strategy Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 23:26 -0400
Re: unit test strategy Dwight Hutto <dwightdhutto@gmail.com> - 2012-09-14 23:32 -0400
Re: unit test strategy Aaron Brady <castironpi@gmail.com> - 2012-09-15 20:24 -0700
Re: unit test strategy Aaron Brady <castironpi@gmail.com> - 2012-09-15 20:24 -0700
Re: unit test strategy Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-16 07:42 +0000
Re: unit test strategy Aaron Brady <castironpi@gmail.com> - 2012-09-16 11:38 -0700
Re: unit test strategy Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2012-09-16 20:01 +0000
Re: unit test strategy Aaron Brady <castironpi@gmail.com> - 2012-09-22 20:07 -0700
Re: unit test strategy Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-09-16 13:28 +0100
csiph-web