Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #43850

Re: equivalent to C pointer

References <CAF3f0sQ_rsdKwaEOCmFHEeEwpVUaNUo-pOYgoqYA_F-k0CftcA@mail.gmail.com> <51702AB6.30609@gmail.com> <CAF3f0sTgxWupYqKDdtqqaPBz2kCZ04404rtDBnsOkDLXAfbQpQ@mail.gmail.com>
From Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com>
Date 2013-04-18 12:25 -0600
Subject Re: equivalent to C pointer
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Message-ID <mailman.787.1366309589.3114.python-list@python.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


On Thu, Apr 18, 2013 at 11:50 AM, abdelkader belahcene
<abelahcene@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for answer,
> but with C  we can compile the trapeze function and put it in librairy,
> If we try to save the trapeze alone in  package to import it later,  I
> think, I am not sure
> it will be refused because F1 and sin are not define !!!     this is the
> power of the C pointers !!!
> the link is dynamic

The Python equivalent of a dynamically linked library is a module.
You can certainly pass functions defined in one module as arguments to
functions defined in another, completely unrelated module.  In fact,
Python doesn't care where they were defined or even whether they are
functions; they're just objects, no different in that regard from
strings or ints or class instances.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: equivalent to C pointer Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2013-04-18 12:25 -0600

csiph-web